The greatest common divisor of n integers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around defining the greatest common divisor (gcd) of a set of n integers, S={a_1...a_n}, and proving its existence and representation as a linear combination of the integers involved. The subject area includes number theory and properties of gcd.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of gcd and its properties, with one attempting to prove that the gcd can be expressed as a linear combination of the integers. Others question the validity of a specific statement regarding the relationship between the gcd of multiple integers and the gcd of pairs.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches, such as induction and counterexamples, with some participants offering guidance on how to think about the problem. There is acknowledgment of differing interpretations and attempts to clarify the original poster's understanding.

Contextual Notes

One participant suggests that the problem may be more appropriate for a different forum category, indicating a potential mismatch in the problem's complexity or context. Additionally, a counterexample is presented that challenges an assumption made by the original poster.

Ratpigeon
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


define the gcd of a set of n integers, S={a_1...a_n}
Prove that exists and can be written as
q_1 a_1+...+q_n a_n for some integers, q_1...q_n

Homework Equations



Euclid's Algorithm?

The Attempt at a Solution



I have the statement that gcd(a_1...a_n) = min( gcd(a_i, a_j) i,j\in{1...n})

and then I know that I can say since any two numbers have a gcd, the gcd exists, and can be represented as a linear combination of the a_i and a_j that have the minimal gcd, but I don't know how to prove the first statement.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I say this should be moved to the Precalculus help page...

Anyhow... :) Well, for a start, your statement is NOT true.
Consider {6,10,15}. Then gcd (6,10,15) = 1, but gcd(6,10) = 2, gcd(6,15) = 3, and gcd(10,15) = 10.

Try solving it for n = 3. See if that gives you any ideas on how to approach the general case.
 
This is easily done by induction (over the number of arguments) from gcd(a_1, a_2) = q_1 a_1 + q_2 a_2.
 
Last edited:
voko said:
This is done by induction.

Assume that gcd(a_1, a_2) = q_1 a_1 + q_2 a_2. This is indeed the case and is known as Bézout's identity (see below).

Now assume gcd(a_1, ..., a_n) = q_1 a_1 + ... + q_n a_n, and check for gcd(a_1, ..., a_n, a_{n + 1}).

It is trivial to show that gcd(a_1, ..., a_n, a_{n + 1}) = gcd(gcd(a_1, ..., a_n), a_{n + 1}), that is, gcd(a_1, ..., a_n, a_{n + 1}) = A gcd(a_1, ..., a_n) + B a_{n + 1} = A (q_1 a_1 + ... + q_n a_n) + B a_{n + 1} = A q_1 a_1 + ... + A q_n a_n + B a_{n + 1}, which is what we are looking for.

You shouldn't merely give the answer - next time, try to lead the OP toward the correct solution. :)
 
Thanks, i didnt catch the counterexample which set me off on the wrong track. Should be fine now
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K