Higgsino: The Supersymmetric Partner of the Higgs - What You Need to Know

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hyksos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Higgsino is identified as the supersymmetric partner of the Higgs boson, expected to be significantly less massive than the Higgs itself. In supersymmetry (SUSY), the Standard Model (SM) Higgs sector comprises at least five particles, each with corresponding SUSY partners. The discussion highlights the contention surrounding the mass of the Higgsino, referencing Roger Penrose's assertion that spin-0 particles, including the Higgs, are more massive than their superpartners. This claim is documented in Penrose's book, "The Road to Reality," but is criticized for being a pop science source rather than a peer-reviewed reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Supersymmetry (SUSY) concepts
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Knowledge of particle mass hierarchy in quantum field theory
  • Ability to interpret scientific literature and references
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of SUSY on particle mass relationships
  • Study the role of the Higgs boson in the Standard Model
  • Examine Roger Penrose's theories on spin and particle mass
  • Explore peer-reviewed literature on Higgsino detection in experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particle theorists, and students of quantum mechanics interested in the implications of supersymmetry and the properties of the Higgs boson and its partners.

hyksos
Messages
35
Reaction score
11
TL;DR
SUSY supersymmetry Higgsino
Supersymmetric partners are expected to only pair off with "fundamental" particles of the Standard Model. (photon, W, Z, gluons, leptons, quarks, graviton). In all those canonical particles, the SUSY partner is significantly more massive than its counterpart.

Internet sources suggest that unofficial name of the supersymmetric partner to the Higgs is the "Higgsino". Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson. Does this low mass mean we should have already found the Higgsino in experiments?

Any other notes we should know about the Higgsino?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hyksos said:
Internet sources

Hey why look at those stuffy old peer-reviewed papers when you have a couple of guys on the internet?

hyksos said:
Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson.

I think you just made this up. You didn't give a source, and if you did get it from elsewhere, they don't know what they are talking about.
  1. In SUSY, the SM Higgs sector has at least five particles.
  2. There are therefore five SUSY partners.
  3. These particles mix with gauginos, so in general there is no particle that is a pure "higgsino".
  4. Obviously then a statement about mass is meaningless.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
hyksos said:
Supersymmetric partners are expected to only pair off with "fundamental" particles of the Standard Model. (photon, W, Z, gluons, leptons, quarks, graviton). In all those canonical particles, the SUSY partner is significantly more massive than its counterpart.

Internet sources suggest that unofficial name of the supersymmetric partner to the Higgs is the "Higgsino". Unlike the rest of the particle pantheon, the Higgsino should be significantly less massive than the Higgs boson.

Please give specific references for these claims; "Internet sources" is not enough.
 
PeterDonis said:
Please give specific references for these claims; "Internet sources" is not enough.
Roger Penrose has claimed that spin-0 particles would in all cases be more massive than their superpartners. This would also include the Higgs being more massive than its superpartner, the Higgsino, ( as the Higgs is spin-0. ) He seems to imply that this follows from the non-existence of negative spin.

This claim appears on page 875, chapter 31, section 2 of the following book.

The Road to Reality A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe.
Vintage; Reprint edition (January 9, 2007)
ISBN-10: 0679776311

ISBN-13: 978-0679776314
 
hyksos said:
This claim appears on page 875, chapter 31, section 2 of the following book.

This is a pop science book, not a textbook or peer-reviewed paper. As such, it is not a valid source for PF discussion.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K