The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on Erwin Schrödinger's book "The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics," specifically his critique of the probability view of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger argues that wave mechanics should not be interpreted through conflicting frameworks, emphasizing that macroscopic energy is a "quantity-concept" while microscopic energy is a "quality-concept." The discussion also references Roger Penrose's perspective on the relationship between gravity and quantum mechanics, suggesting that unifying these concepts may eventually clarify the mysteries of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with wave mechanics
  • Knowledge of Schrödinger's contributions to quantum theory
  • Awareness of Roger Penrose's theories on gravity and quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" by Erwin Schrödinger
  • Explore Roger Penrose's works on quantum mechanics and gravity
  • Study the implications of wave function collapse in quantum theory
  • Investigate the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of quantum theory.

Epsilon Pi
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone,

This time I want to share with you my experience with the book the Interpretation of Quantum mechanics by Erwin Schrödinger. Just let me point out some of his most remarkable points in my humble opinion. In his first chapter, JULY 1952 COLLOQUIUM, he wrote:

Let me say at the outset, that in this discourse, I am opposing not a few special statements of quantum mechanics held today, I am opposing as it were the whole of it... The view that I am opposing is so widely accepted... It is, as I said, the Probability view of quantum mechanics...pag19

Macroscopic energy is a "quantity-concept". Microscopic energy(meaning hv) is a "quality-concept"pag25

Wave mechanics can never conflict with the U.P. The conflict is produced by imposing on wave mechanics the probability view... To my mind it is patently absurd to let the wave function be controlled in two entirely different ways, at times by the wave equation, but occasionally by direct interference of the observer, not controlled by the wave equation...pag35

Just wonder how are things today?

My best regards and enjoy a great book

EP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First quote: The interpretation of wave functions (or more generally the scalar product of two quantum state vectors) as a probability amplitude is accepted by everyone, simply because it works extremely well.

Second: I don't know what he means.

Third: If you e.g. read any of Penrose's books, you'll see that he completely agrees with this. I do too, in a way. It is absurd to say that state vectors change with time in two different ways that contradict each other. However, it's only absurd if you think of quantum mechanics as a model of reality, i.e. as something that describes reality. If we just think of it as a method that we can use to calculate probabilities of possibilities, then there is no problem. Unfortunately, no one knows if this is the correct solution to the problem or just a way to ignore it. Penrose has another answer. He argues quite convincingly (in my opinion) that gravity should destroy superpositions. So maybe the mystery of quantum mechanics will be eventually be solved by the efforts to unify gravity with the other interactions.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
23K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K