The Klein bottle using the Euler caracteristic + orientability caracterisation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler Klein
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Euler characteristic and orientability characterization of the Klein bottle, specifically addressing the confusion surrounding its homeomorphism to \mathbb{R}P^2\#\mathbb{R}P^2. The Euler characteristic formula for two surfaces, \chi(M\#N)=\chi(M)+\chi(N)-2, is applied, leading to the conclusion that the Klein bottle has an Euler characteristic of zero, similar to a torus. The participant initially misinterprets the #_k notation, which refers to the number of spaces glued together, ultimately clarifying that k should be 2, not 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler characteristic in topology
  • Familiarity with orientability of surfaces
  • Knowledge of homeomorphism concepts
  • Basic skills in triangulation of surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of non-orientable surfaces in topology
  • Learn about triangulation techniques for complex surfaces
  • Explore the implications of the Euler characteristic in algebraic topology
  • Investigate the classification theorems of surfaces and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, topology students, and educators interested in advanced concepts of surface classification and Euler characteristics.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I went off on my own to study the Euler caracteristic + orentability caracterisation of closed surface and I must have gotten lost somewhere, because I do not find that the Klein bottle is homeomorphic to \mathbb{R}P^2\#\mathbb{R}P^2 as I should.

I started with the result that for two surfaces M and N, we have

\chi(M\#N)=\chi(M)+\chi(N)-2

then I proved by induction that

\chi(M^{\#_k})=(k+1)\chi(M)-2k

which can be solved for k:

k=\frac{\chi(M^{\#_k})-\chi(M)}{\chi(M)-2}

Now, the Klein bottle is not orientable, so it must be homeomorphic to (\mathbb{R}P^2)^{\#_k} for some k. And since the Euler caracteristic is a topological invariant, it must be that

\chi((\mathbb{R}P^2)^{\#_k})=\chi(K)

And so, according to the above formula for k, with \chi(M)=\chi(\mathbb{R}P^2)=1,

k=\frac{\chi(K)-1}{1-2}=1-\chi(K)

So all that remains to do is to triangulate K and find its Euler caracteristic. A fundamental polygon for the Klein bottle is provided here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_theorems_of_surfaces#Construction_from_polygons

I believe it can be triangulated simply by drawing a side across one of the diagonal. All the vertices are identified, so V=1. There are 3 distinct sides, so E=3. My triangulation has 2 triangles so F=2, thus

\chi(K)=1-3+2=0

But this means that k=1, which is incorrect. It should be 2.

Where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well your euler characteristic calculation seems correct, since just looking at a picture of a klein bottle (the picture in my head) shows it obviously has the same edges faces and vertices as a torus, hence has the same euler chracteristic, namely zero. so the error is likely somewhere else.
 
Whoah! There's no error at all !

\mathbb{R}P^2\#\mathbb{R}P^2 = (\mathbb{R}P^2)^{\#_1}

k=1 is correct!

Edit: No! k should be 2 but I made an error in the very beginning by misinterpreting the #_k notation. I thought k referred to the number of # symbol, while it refers to the number of spaces you glue together.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K