I went off on my own to study the Euler caracteristic + orentability caracterisation of closed surface and I must have gotten lost somewhere, because I do not find that the Klein bottle is homeomorphic to [itex]\mathbb{R}P^2\#\mathbb{R}P^2[/itex] as I should.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I started with the result that for two surfaces M and N, we have

[tex]\chi(M\#N)=\chi(M)+\chi(N)-2[/tex]

then I proved by induction that

[tex]\chi(M^{\#_k})=(k+1)\chi(M)-2k[/tex]

which can be solved for k:

[tex]k=\frac{\chi(M^{\#_k})-\chi(M)}{\chi(M)-2}[/tex]

Now, the Klein bottle is not orientable, so it must be homeomorphic to [itex](\mathbb{R}P^2)^{\#_k}[/itex] for some k. And since the Euler caracteristic is a topological invariant, it must be that

[tex]\chi((\mathbb{R}P^2)^{\#_k})=\chi(K)[/tex]

And so, according to the above formula for k, with [itex]\chi(M)=\chi(\mathbb{R}P^2)=1[/itex],

[tex]k=\frac{\chi(K)-1}{1-2}=1-\chi(K)[/tex]

So all that remains to do is to triangulate K and find its Euler caracteristic. A fundamental polygon for the Klein bottle is provided here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_theorems_of_surfaces#Construction_from_polygons

I believe it can be triangulated simply by drawing a side across one of the diagonal. All the vertices are identified, so V=1. There are 3 distinct sides, so E=3. My triangulation has 2 triangles so F=2, thus

[tex]\chi(K)=1-3+2=0[/tex]

But this means that k=1, which is incorrect. It should be 2.

Where did I go wrong?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# The Klein bottle using the Euler caracteristic + orientability caracterisation

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**