The Miller indices- searching for a proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter antonni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of Lemma 1 related to Miller indices in crystallography, specifically referencing "Elementary Crystallography An Introduction to the Fundamental Geometrical Features of Crystals" by Buerger. Anton expresses difficulty in understanding the provided "mini proof" and seeks a more rigorous mathematical explanation. The conversation highlights the complexity of deriving results using the equation a*(x-x_0)+b*(y-y_0)+c*(z-z_0)=0 and suggests considering lattice points within the quadrant for a more elegant approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Miller indices in crystallography
  • Familiarity with the equation of a plane in three-dimensional space
  • Basic knowledge of lattice points and their significance in crystallography
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and derivations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Miller indices in crystallography
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of lattice points
  • Explore rigorous mathematical proofs related to crystallographic planes
  • Investigate advanced topics in crystallography, such as Bravais lattices
USEFUL FOR

Students of crystallography, researchers in materials science, and mathematicians interested in geometric proofs will benefit from this discussion.

antonni
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi all, first let me post this (from "Elementary Crystallography An Introduction to the Fundamental Geometrical Features of Crystals" by Buerger):
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1-png.82644/
Can someone please explain me the proof of Lemma 1? I just can not see it with the "mini proof" provided. Maybe a rigorous mathematical proof?

Thank you,

Anton
 

Attachments

  • 1 - Copy.png
    1 - Copy.png
    78.3 KB · Views: 784
Last edited by a moderator:
don't know really how to reword it...but others can try
 
i tried for quite a while to derive the results using a*(x-x_0)+b*(y-y_0)+c*(z-z_0)=0 equations, but got B*C+B^2*C/A+C^2*B/A planes to reach A*B*C along the x axis...

there may be a more elegant approach considering the number of latice points within the quadrant (from origin to rational plane) where each point is where a new parallel plane would originate. but then you would have to remove all the degenerate planes

here is another place that states the same and does a rough sketch: https://books.google.com/books?id=SHzeQ49ZlH4C&pg=PA12&lpg=PA12&dq=ABC+planes+miller&source=bl&ots=QLFbVXZoyf&sig=RJbIjR6Nd4Gm_AJx0QClHio1GFU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pDFmVcKoCsXUsAWiuID4DA&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=ABC planes miller&f=false
 
Thanks for the reply...yes, just one of those things everyone takes for granted and think its basic knowledge, but not straight forward at all

ill try it again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K