The molecular field approximation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the molecular field approximation (MFA) and its implications for calculating the Neel temperature (T_N) in magnetic systems. The formula presented, \(\hat{A}\hat{B}\approx \hat{A}\langle\hat{B}\rangle+\hat{B}\langle\hat{A}\rangle-\langle\hat{A}\rangle\langle\hat{B}\rangle\), highlights the neglect of correlated fluctuations between variables A and B. The relationship between the Neel temperatures calculated using MFA (T_N^{MFA}) and random phase approximation (RPA) (T_N^{RPA}) is questioned, suggesting that the MFA may overlook significant correlations that affect temperature estimations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular field approximation (MFA)
  • Familiarity with random phase approximation (RPA)
  • Knowledge of Neel temperature in magnetic systems
  • Basic concepts of statistical mechanics and fluctuations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of molecular field approximation (MFA)
  • Explore the random phase approximation (RPA) and its significance in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between Neel temperature (T_N) and magnetic ordering
  • Study the effects of correlated fluctuations in statistical models
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in condensed matter physics, researchers studying magnetic phase transitions, and students learning about statistical mechanics and approximation methods.

matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
MFA

[tex]\hat{A}\hat{B}\approx \hat{A}\langle\hat{B}\rangle+\hat{B}\langle\hat{A}\rangle-\langle\hat{A}\rangle\langle\hat{B}\rangle[/tex]

What this mean physically? What we neglect here?

If I calculate Neel temperature using this method [tex]T_N^{MFA}[/tex] and using RPA method [tex]T_N^{RPA}[/tex] is there some relation between those temperatures?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mean-field approximation method
 
Perhaps a natural way to see the decomposition is if A and B are fluctuations around some mean, i.e. <A> = <B> = 0. Then you just have AB ~ 0, i.e. you are neglecting correlated fluctuations in A and B.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K