The Mysteries of Exergy: A Micro-Level Analysis of Energy Forms

  • Thread starter Thread starter ishendra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of exergy, defined as the maximum available work extractable from a system before it reaches equilibrium with its surroundings. Participants analyze the quality of different energy forms, emphasizing that heat is not inferior but has lower exergy due to its random molecular motion. Mechanical energy is identified as the highest quality energy, fully convertible to work, while low-temperature heat is noted for its minimal convertibility. The analysis also references the thermodynamic principles outlined in the book by Cengel and Boles, which categorizes energy types based on their versatility and efficiency in work production.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles, particularly exergy and entropy.
  • Familiarity with energy forms: mechanical energy, thermal energy, and mass energy.
  • Knowledge of the Otto cycle and its efficiency calculations.
  • Basic grasp of molecular motion and degrees of freedom in gases.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of exergy and its applications in thermodynamics.
  • Explore the thermodynamic quality of energy as described in Cengel and Boles' texts.
  • Learn about the Otto cycle efficiency formula and its implications for different gases.
  • Investigate the relationship between entropy and energy quality in thermodynamic systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, energy analysts, and anyone interested in the efficiency of energy conversion processes.

ishendra
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hello all. I know that exergy of of a system is the maximum available work which can be extracted before coming in equilibrium with the surroundings. However, i wanted to understand it at a micro level. Why certain forms of energy have less exergy. I will give you an example on the kind of analysis i want.. Heat is an 'inferior' energy. Now, how i look at it(it may be incorrect) is that because heat is simply effect of random molecular motion, hence, to produce useful work, only a part of that random motion is being used. Hence, only a part is helping in bulk motion of piston etc, thus producing less work. I need similar analysis for other types of energy.Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Heat isn't inferior energy, it's just one form of energy.
The temperature of an object is one aspect of an object's total energy, it also has energy in the form of it's mass and the energy binding atomic nucleii together..
Some nuclear reactions can make part of that mass energy available but usually all we do with it is convert it to heat, then use some kind of conventional heat driven machine to further convert the energy into something useful, electricity in particular.
 
ishendra, I read a very good summary of the background of this in a thermo book by Cengel and Boles. They grade different types of energy in terms of their "quality," based on their versatility. Mechanical energy has the highest quality, being 100% convertible to work or any form of heat. Next highest is high temperature heat, largely convertible to work, 100% convertible to low temperature heat. Lowest is low temperature heat, minimally convertible to work, more so to high temperature heat.
This is similar to your describing heat as "inferior" to mechanical energy. Of course, entropy varies in the opposite direction as energy "quality."
I agree with your thinking that the randomness in direction of thermal energy (heat) is what makes it less useful, because only part of the thermal energy in a material (say a gas) is in the right direction to produce work (by pushing on a piston or a turbine blade). The more degrees of freedom in the gas in an Otto cycle engine, the lower the efficiency. For example, a noble gas has 3 DOF's (translations only), giving it a specific heat ratio k of 1.67. Nitrogen has 5 DOF's and therefore a k of 1.40. If you plug the values for k into the Otto cycle efficiency 1 - 1/(CR^k-1), where CR is the compression ratio.
So in "short," I agree with your thinking.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ishendra

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K