The Mystery of Googolplex: Trillion-DNA Strands in California Mud

  • Thread starter Thread starter jim mcnamara
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Extracellular large DNA strands with methanogenic sequences have been discovered in California mud, potentially linked to the concept of "borgs." Researchers face challenges in cultivating methanogens in the lab, leading them to analyze trillions of DNA strands from mud samples. The discussion touches on the possibility of these DNA strands integrating into host genomes, which could facilitate evolution and adaptation. Additionally, it highlights that humans carry about 8% of their DNA from ancient viral sequences, raising questions about the implications of such genetic integration. The findings underscore the complex interplay between environmental DNA and evolutionary processes.
jim mcnamara
Mentor
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
3,852
TL;DR Summary
Extracellular huge DNA strands found in anoxic soils. The strands were named 'borgs' because the kid of the researcher suggested it - too much Star Trek I guess.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...equences-known-borgs-recovered-california-mud

These are extracellular very large DNA strands that have some methanogenic DNA sequences. The researchers feel that these bacteria may be the source of borgs. Since growing methanogens in the lab is difficult, the researchers have rely on searching through incredible numbers of DNA strands found in samples of mud. The article mentions sorting through literally trillions of extracellular DNA strands in the samples.

-- posted because, in part, names for new "things" sometimes are inspired by children. Example from Mathworld:

Googolplex is a large number equal to. (i.e., 1 with a googol number of 0s written after it). The term was coined in 1938 after 9-year-old Milton Sirotta, nephew of Edward Kasner, coined the term "googol" and Kasner extended it to this larger number (Kasner 1989, pp. 20-27; Bialik 2004).

Googolplex -- from Wolfram MathWorld​

https://mathworld.wolfram.com › Googolplex
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes BillTre, pinball1970 and atyy
Biology news on Phys.org
If I read it correctly, another interesting point is that it is possible for these DNA strands to be incorporated into an organism's genome perhaps helping them to evolve and adapt to new environments. Should we let our kids play in the dirt?
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
How bizarre. Hopefully, they can get some culture-based experiments done.
 
gleem said:
If I read it correctly, another interesting point is that it is possible for these DNA strands to be incorporated into an organism's genome perhaps helping them to evolve and adapt to new environments. Should we let our kids play in the dirt?
With Eukaryotic cells?

Lateral transfer has been known about for a while but I always associated it with microbes plasmids etc
 
There are rare cases among metazoans (animals).
Bdellid rotifers provide a well documented, long term example.
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
FWIW humans have about 8% of DNA is from other "things", notably retroviruses, which embed viral DNA into our DNA. Termed "DNA integration"

Example:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC509317/ ::
[synopsis]
[snip]
...
Retroviruses use viral enzymes to copy their own genome, which is stored in an RNA transcript, into DNA. Now recognizable by the host's genome, the virus can integrate into one of the host's chromosomes. In this study, Mitchell et al. studied vectors derived from the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), avian sarcoma-leukosis virus (ASLV), and murine leukemia virus (MLV). Introducing the viral vectors into human cells, the authors analyzed the gene expression profiles of the cells to determine where vectors integrate into human chromosomes and which, if any, genes they activate. ...
[/snip]
[/synopsis]
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
What happens when one of these new genes strikes a chord with the host's genome?
 
It would have to integrated into the new genome.
Then it would probably evolve to better work with that specific genome it ended up in (interact better with the other parts of the genome).
May eventually (over long periods of time) evolve new functions
 
Often times nothing happens. This perception is because of the DNA having been there for really long periods of time. The genes in the DNA appear not to be expressed. Note the weasel words...

They are usually called 'Ancient virus'. They are virus genome sequences that have been "dragged along" in our genome going as far back as 40 million years. Most seem to be inactive. The sequences came from three genera: Bornavirus, Ebolavirus, and Margurgvirus. Note that virus taxonomy is really weird compared to plant and animal taxonomy. There no species in viral taxonomy, there are what are termed "quasispecies" of virus.

Ancient DNA from these viruses make up about 8% of human DNA.
Source:
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001030
Unexpected inheritance: multiple integrations of ancient bornavirus and ebolavirus/marburgvirus sequences in vertebrate genomes
Vladimir A Belyi 1 , Arnold J Levine, Anna Marie Skalka

For a better answer to @gleem
-> A more student friendly article about 'the non-human living in you':
https://www.cshl.edu/the-non-human-living-inside-of-you/
 

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top