The Myth of the Overqualified Ph.D.?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TMFKAN64
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph.d
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the perception that having a Ph.D. can hinder job prospects due to being considered overqualified. Some participants share personal experiences where Ph.D. candidates were rejected for positions because employers feared they would become bored or leave for better opportunities. Others argue that while being overqualified can be a concern, it often relates more to the candidate's fit and motivation than their qualifications alone. The conversation also highlights the low unemployment rate among Ph.D. holders, suggesting that while overqualification may be a barrier, it does not reflect the overall job market for advanced degree holders. Ultimately, the complexities of hiring decisions reveal that motivation and alignment with job expectations are critical factors in the hiring process.
  • #31
chingkui said:
People would actually do that?
I worked for a supplier of engineered fabrics to the pulp and paper industry. Everybody in that field knows everybody else, and there is often no love lost between competitors. So yes. I hadn't told my boss that I was taking an interview, so he couldn't have told his boss (the company's sales manager). I assume that the sales manager of the company that offered me the position called his old nemesis (and former co-worker in the field) and crowed about hiring me away. It might have been more subtle, but it happened SO fast that I doubt it. I never asked my new boss how my old sales manager found out - the cat was out of the bag, anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K