The 'New International Energy Order'

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy International
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,643
Reaction score
7,691
Oil [and Gas] and the 'New International Energy Order'
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89565453
Fresh Air from WHYY, April 14, 2008 · With both the cost of and demand for oil rising, nations with large energy reserves are redrawing political and military alliances, and oil-rich countries like Russia and Venezuela are enjoying greater influence. Michael Klare, author of Rising Power, Shrinking Planet, calls it the "new international energy order."

Klare is the director of the Five College Program in Peace and World Security Studies based at Hampshire College in Amherst, Mass. He is the author of several books, including Blood and Oil, which examines the danger of American's dependence on foreign oil, and Rogue States and Nuclear Outlaws, a study of new American foreign policy.
The US has been outmaneuvered by Russia, China and other states with gas and oil. Putin has retaken control of oil and gas in Russia under Gazprom, and US has lost whatever they invested in the Russian market.

The US has established Africom (the US Africa Command) - and it appears that Africa will be militarized.

China is forming alliances with Iran and Venezula.

Russia, Iran and Qatar are considering forming a GPEC (OPEC for natural gas).

Russia and China formed the Shanghai Cooperation Organziation (SCO) in 1996 with other central asian states, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tadjikistan. There is a security dimension both in military cooperation and energy.

So perhaps we'll see the energy wars along the lines of the Cold War.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
seems like the common denominator is not-an-alliance-with-the-US-policy. I am afraid the US is going to have less allies in this 'cold war'.

But hope is on the way...Me myself for instance is investigating how to turn US' large coal depository into clean burning synthetic gas.
 
Nuclear power would be better. Also, if we could just tap all the oil we already have it would certainly help!
 
drankin said:
Nuclear power would be better. Also, if we could just tap all the oil we already have it would certainly help!

I don't know if I want my car to run on a nuclear reactor?:rolleyes:
 
Astronuc said:
Oil [and Gas] and the 'New International Energy Order'
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89565453
The US has been outmaneuvered by Russia, China and other states with gas and oil. Putin has retaken control of oil and gas in Russia under Gazprom, and US has lost whatever they invested in the Russian market.

The US has established Africom (the US Africa Command) - and it appears that Africa will be militarized.

China is forming alliances with Iran and Venezula.

Russia, Iran and Qatar are considering forming a GPEC (OPEC for natural gas).

Russia and China formed the Shanghai Cooperation Organziation (SCO) in 1996 with other central asian states, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tadjikistan. There is a security dimension both in military cooperation and energy.

So perhaps we'll see the energy wars along the lines of the Cold War.


This may be even worse than the cold war because it is going to affect a lot more people in this country. Many Americans were barely aware that there was a cold war.

From what I have observed with China, they tend to go into a country and pay cash up front to develop an entire oil field. Then they pump the oil and pay a predetermined price for it. The oil entirely bypasses the speculative markets that drive up our prices.
 
jaap de vries said:
I don't know if I want my car to run on a nuclear reactor?:rolleyes:

Your car would run on electricity, jaap, electricty produced by nuclear power plants. I hope you weren't being serious.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
29K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K