The physics behind the thermal light quantum imaging?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on thermal light ghost imaging, which operates classically without the need for quantum entanglement. It describes the process of shining laser light through a rotating ground glass disk to create a time-varying diffraction pattern. This pattern is then analyzed using a beam splitter, a single pixel detector, and a position-sensitive detector, revealing images through classical correlation rather than "spooky action." The conversation also references Jeffrey Shapiro's article on ghost imaging, providing a comprehensive overview of classical versus non-classical methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal light ghost imaging principles
  • Familiarity with beam splitter configurations
  • Knowledge of single pixel and position-sensitive detectors
  • Basic concepts of diffraction patterns and their generation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Jeffrey Shapiro's article "ghost imaging: from quantum to classical to computational"
  • Explore the use of digital micromirror devices in imaging
  • Study the principles of classical correlation in optical systems
  • Investigate the differences between classical and quantum ghost imaging techniques
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, optical engineers, and physicists interested in imaging techniques, particularly those exploring the distinctions between classical and quantum imaging methods.

zaccurio
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does it indicate that the " spooky action(correlation)" even can be found in classical level, where entanglement is hardly can be built?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thermal light ghost imaging works in a classical manner without entanglement. Correlation is there, but it is not a spooky action at all. In thermal ghost imaging you typically shine laser light through a rotating ground glass disk. This will create a diffraction pattern which varies rapidly with time. Now you send this diffraction pattern through a beam splitter and place the iimage you want to look at and a single pixel detector in one arm and the position sensitive detector in the other arm. The image will reappear in the coincidence counts between the single pixel detector and the position sensitive detector because the two beams are classically correlated without involving any spooky action. They simply are the same time-varying diffraction pattern.

In principle it is also possible to do this kind of experiment completely without the second position sensitive detector. If you can deterministically create the time-varying diffraction pattern - for example using a digital micromirror device or a spatial light modulator - you can correlate the signal on the single-pixel camera with the pattern the other detector would have seen (you can calculate it as the diffraction pattern is created deterministically) and will find the image by doing so. If you are interested in this topic, a good overview and comparison of classical versus non-classical ghost imaging methods can be found in Jeffrey Shapiro's overview article "ghost imaging: from quantum to classical to computational" (Advances in Optics and Photonics, Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp. 405-450 (2010)).
It is very detailed.
 
thank u very much. I got some brief notion. I then wonder the imaging thing just give a illusion of imagining by a trick of "coincidence counts". I will squezee out sometime to have a detailed learning .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
576
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K