The Physics of Consciousness by Dr. Evan Harris Walker

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Dr. Evan Harris Walker's book "The Physics of Consciousness," which is criticized for its perceived misrepresentation of quantum mechanics (QM). Participants assert that the book fails to provide a clear, unbiased description of quantum experiments, emphasizing that QM does not necessitate consciousness. The consensus is that the book is not a valuable resource for understanding modern quantum mechanics, as it intertwines consciousness with QM unnecessarily.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with mainstream scientific discourse
  • Knowledge of experimental methods in physics
  • Critical thinking skills for evaluating scientific literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research foundational quantum mechanics concepts through resources like "Quantum Physics for Beginners"
  • Explore the experimental results of quantum mechanics without philosophical implications
  • Study the role of consciousness in scientific theories through literature critiques
  • Examine reputable sources on quantum mechanics from established physicists
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone seeking a clear understanding of quantum mechanics without the influence of consciousness-related theories.

Rnnat
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
What are your opinions on this book? I know that many physicists like to present even the experimental results of quantum mechanics in a distorted way; does this book do so?

All I am looking for is a resource where I can learn, in layman's terms for now, about quantum mechanics. I don't want to learn about the theory, I don't want the theory the author prescribes to to influence his/her description of the experiments. All I am looking for is a description of the experiments so that I can personally and critically examine current theories.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect the book, based on the little I've read about it, is pure bunk.

Point is, if you are interested in Quantum Mechanics, leave consciousness out of it. QM does not require consciousness.

EDIT: and by the way, mainstream scientists do not misrepresent QM and this forum is about mainstream science.
 
phinds said:
I suspect the book, based on the little I've read about it, is pure bunk.

Point is, if you are interested in Quantum Mechanics, leave consciousness out of it. QM does not require consciousness.

EDIT: and by the way, mainstream scientists do not misrepresent QM and this forum is about mainstream science.

What phinds said. For purposes of understanding modern quantum mechanics (and that's what Physics forums is about) the book is useless.

[the follow-on discussion has been moved into another thread, so this one can be closed]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
17K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K