The Physics of dragon flight possible

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silvershade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flight Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of dragon flight, specifically focusing on the physical characteristics and requirements for a dragon, realistically sized, to achieve powered flight. Participants explore various aspects such as wing size, tail shape, and comparisons to existing flying creatures, while emphasizing a non-magical, scientific approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a dragon weighing around 150 lbs would require a wingspan of approximately 16 feet for powered flight, but raise concerns about the scaling of wing structure from insects to larger creatures.
  • Others argue that insects do not scale well in size and that the mechanics of flight differ significantly between insects and birds, which complicates the feasibility of a dragon-like creature.
  • A participant highlights the lift-to-mass ratio, noting that as the size of the dragon increases, the mass grows faster than the lift generated by the wings, posing a challenge for flight.
  • Some propose looking at pterosaurs, which were large flying reptiles, as a potential model for understanding how a dragon might achieve flight.
  • There is a suggestion to consider the atmospheric conditions of Earth, questioning whether dragons would need to exist in a different environment to be viable for flight.
  • One participant humorously suggests starting with a dragon-shaped helium balloon as a more realistic approach to the concept of dragon flight.
  • Several participants reference the historical context of large flying creatures, such as pterodactyls and azhdarchids, to inform the discussion on dragon flight capabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the feasibility of dragon flight. Disagreements arise regarding the scaling of wing structures, the implications of body mass on flight, and the environmental conditions necessary for such creatures to exist.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the assumptions about wing loading and the physical properties of materials required for flight. The discussion also touches on the historical context of flying creatures and the atmospheric conditions that may affect flight capabilities.

Silvershade
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So let's take a dragon, not a godzilla sized one because I'm trying to be realistic.. but say horse sized, roughly 1 ton in weight,
or something about wolf sized so about 150 lbs
They have 2 wings, 1 tail, 2 legs, 2 arms, and a head... because headless dragons are no fun.

how large would the wings have to be for powered flight and what tail shape would give the dragon the most energy efficient flight if the dragon wanted to behave like an eagle (swooping and coming up again)

no these dragons do not breathe fire/ are magical.. I want a pure realistic answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A 150 pound flying dragon fly - and you're trying to be realistic. I think you have failed.

Insects, especially flying insects, don't scale up that far.
But let's say we go for a 16 foot wingspan. You'll run into two problems right away. The first is that insects don't move their wings as birds do, but if you scale them up, they better. But even with bird-like flapping, there is a problem with the strength on the wing material. You're going to need to beef up the wings - they won't look exactly like a dragon fly.

It might be better to start with an eagle, scale it to 150 pounds, and then make it look cosmetically, like a dragon fly.

Or adapt a 150 pound remote control craft to look like a dragon fly.
 
Silvershade said:
So let's take a dragon, not a godzilla sized one because I'm trying to be realistic.. but say horse sized, roughly 1 ton in weight,
or something about wolf sized so about 150 lbs
They have 2 wings, 1 tail, 2 legs, 2 arms, and a head... because headless dragons are no fun.

how large would the wings have to be for powered flight and what tail shape would give the dragon the most energy efficient flight if the dragon wanted to behave like an eagle (swooping and coming up again)

no these dragons do not breathe fire/ are magical.. I want a pure realistic answer
The problem is this. It's lift vs. mass.

Take one dimension of your beast. Let's call it the radius of your beast. The lift of the wings depends on surface area, so lift increases as the square of the radius increases. But mass increases as the cube of the radius. So as the radius increases, mass increases faster than lift. Soon the beast can't get off of the ground. Proportionally more and more has to go into the wings to get enough lift. Then you have further problems. Big wings can't beat when the beast is standing on the ground: there isn't enough room. The biggest birds have real difficulty launching themselves.

As for the most efficient shape, birds and pterodactyls and bats should be pretty much there already.

The largest known flying creatures are a group of pterosaurs named azhdarchids, extinct flying reptiles that existed during the age of the dinosaurs and died out at the end of the Cretaceous. Estimations of the wingspan of the largest species likeQuetzalcoatlus and Hatzegopteryx exceed 10 m (33 ft), with less conservative estimates being 12 m (39 ft) or more. Mass estimates for these azhdarchids are on the order of 200–250 kg (440–550 lb).[6] Golly! So those dragons could exist. There have also been 150 lb flying birds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentavis
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dotini and Ryan_m_b
.Scott said:
A 150 pound flying dragon fly - and you're trying to be realistic. I think you have failed.

Insects, especially flying insects, don't scale up that far.
But let's say we go for a 16 foot wingspan. You'll run into two problems right away. The first is that insects don't move their wings as birds do, but if you scale them up, they better. But even with bird-like flapping, there is a problem with the strength on the wing material. You're going to need to beef up the wings - they won't look exactly like a dragon fly.

It might be better to start with an eagle, scale it to 150 pounds, and then make it look cosmetically, like a dragon fly.

Or adapt a 150 pound remote control craft to look like a dragon fly.
a dragon... not a dragon fly..
a reptilian dragon
 
Silvershade said:
a dragon... not a dragon fly.. a reptilian dragon
Sorry. I guess I was trying to be too realistic.
Dragons are pretty fat. Maybe you should start with a dragon-shaped helium balloon.
Other than that, the only difference in the discussion between dragon and dragon fly is that dragons have never flown.
Perhaps you'll settle for a pterodactyl: http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/3471/1/MacCready.pdf
 
Last edited:
Look up Pterosaurs.

They were flying reptiles that lived about 228 to 66 million years ago. They had a wingspan up to 10 meters (34 feet) and weighed in 145 kg (320 lbs).

These creatures were estimated to fly over 100 kph.

Perhaps they would make a good starting point.
 
Is there any particular chapter you'd like me to read to you?

http://www.amazon.com/dp/0060110740/?tag=pfamazon01-20
dragons-001-754x1024.jpg
 
.Scott said:
Insects, especially flying insects, don't scale up that far.
Insects are limited mostly in size by the concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere, not physics of flight, there have been gigantic insects in the past.

These dragons, do they have to exist on earth? Earth has a pretty thin atmosphere and pretty high gravity.
 
  • #10
newjerseyrunner said:
Insects are limited mostly in size by the concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere, not physics of flight, there have been gigantic insects in the past.

These dragons, do they have to exist on earth? Earth has a pretty thin atmosphere and pretty high gravity.
The only reason that I mentioned insects was because I misread the OP. Insects also don't scale up in terms of their body structures. In general, wing loading does not scale. For constant wing loading, you need wing area proportional to mass.
 
  • #12
I guess the reason why dragons in fairy stories frequently are guarding treasure is so the hero has a reason to try to tackle the beast.
If there was no treasure to be had, I reckon most sane people would prefer to get the hell out of the way instead risking incineration and dismemberment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: XZ923

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K