MHB The polynomial is irreducible iff the condition is satisfied

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I need some help at the following exercise:

Show that the polynomial $f(x)=x^n+1 \in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ is irreducible if and only if $n=2^k$ for some integer $k \geq 0$.

Could you give me some hints what I could do?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a fairly straightforward algebra exercise. Hint : show that

$$x^{2n+1} + 1 = (x + 1)\left ( x^{2n} - x^{2n-1} + \cdots - x + 1 \right)$$
 
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

I need some help at the following exercise:

Show that the polynomial $f(x)=x^n+1 \in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ is irreducible if and only if $n=2^k$ for some integer $k \geq 0$.

Could you give me some hints what I could do?? (Wondering)

Hi mathmari,

Note that $n$ is of the form $2^k \ell$, where $k \ge 0$ and $\ell$ is odd. Thus $x^n + 1 = x^{2^k \ell} + 1 = (x^{2^k})^{\ell} + 1$. Hence, if $\ell > 1$, $x^{2^k} + 1$ is a proper factor of $x^n + 1$. In case $\ell = 1$, show that $(x + 1)^n + 1$ is irreducible by application of Eisenstein's criterion with $p = 2$. Show that this implies $x^n + 1$ is irreducible.
 
Eh, Eisenstein's criterion is a bit too much. Some easy polynomial factorizations, Gauss lemma and a pack of popcorns does the trick.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Back
Top