The polynomial is irreducible over Q(i)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the irreducibility of the polynomial $x^4-2$ over the field $\mathbb{Q}(i)$. Participants explore the implications of its irreducibility in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ and consider various approaches to demonstrate that it remains irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$. The conversation includes technical reasoning, potential factorizations, and the relationship between different fields.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that $x^4-2$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ by Eisenstein's criterion with $p=2$.
  • Participants discuss the assumption that $x^4-2$ is reducible over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ and explore how to derive a contradiction from this assumption.
  • There are suggestions to consider factorizations of $x^4-2$ in $\mathbb{C}[x]$ and check if any resulting coefficients belong to $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.
  • Some participants propose that if a polynomial is reducible over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$, it must also be reducible over $\mathbb{C}$, leading to a discussion about the nature of coefficients in these fields.
  • Participants explore specific factorizations, such as $(x^2-\sqrt{2})(x^2+\sqrt{2})$ and $(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2})$, questioning whether these factorizations yield coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.
  • There is a consideration of the uniqueness of polynomial factorization over fields and the implications for the irreducibility of $x^4-2$.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the irreducibility of $x^4-2$ over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$, as some express uncertainty about the necessary conditions for factorization and the implications of their findings. Multiple competing views remain regarding the approaches to demonstrate irreducibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the relationships between different fields and the implications of polynomial factorization. There are unresolved questions about the specific forms of factorizations and whether they yield coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that the polynomial $x^4-2\in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ remains irreducible in the ring $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$.

I have done the following:

The polynomial is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ by Eisenstein's criterion with $p=2$.

Then if $a$ is a root of $x^4-2$ then the degree of the extension $\mathbb{Q}(a)$ over the field $\mathbb{Q}$ is $4$ : $[\mathbb{Q}(a):\mathbb{Q}]=4$.

We assume that the polynomial $x^4-2$ is reducible over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.

Is everything correct so far? If yes, how could we continue to get a contradiction? Do we have to check all possible factorizations of $x^4-2$ ?

(Wondering)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

I want to show that the polynomial $x^4-2\in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ remains irreducible in the ring $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$.

I have done the following:

The polynomial is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ by Eisenstein's criterion with $p=2$.

Then if $a$ is a root of $x^4-2$ then the degree of the extension $\mathbb{Q}(a)$ over te field $\mathbb{Q}$ is $4$ : $[\mathbb{Q}(a):\mathbb{Q}]=4$.

We assume that the polynomial $x^4-2$ is reducible over $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.

Is everything correct so far? If yes, how could we continue to get a contradiction? Do we have to check all possible factorizations of $x^4-2$ ?

(Wondering)

Hey mathmari!

Do you have a link to some course material that relates to this problem? (Wondering)

As a possible approach, consider that $\mathbb Q(i)$ is a subfield of $\mathbb C$. So any reduction over $\mathbb Q(i)$ must also be a reduction over $\mathbb C$, mustn't it?
So if we list the reductions over $\mathbb C$, we can check if there is a rational one. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Do you have a link to some course material that relates to this problem? (Wondering)

No, I don't have. (Thinking)
I like Serena said:
As a possible approach, consider that $\mathbb Q(i)$ is a subfield of $\mathbb C$.

What other approaches are there? (Wondering)
I like Serena said:
So any reduction over $\mathbb Q(i)$ must also be a reduction over $\mathbb C$, mustn't it?
So if we list the reductions over $\mathbb C$, we can check if there is a rational one. (Thinking)

Do you mean that we have to check the factorization of the polynomial in $\mathbb{C}$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
No, I don't have. (Thinking)

What other approaches are there? (Wondering)

I don't know. I'm not really familiar with field extensions and splitting fields.

mathmari said:
Do you mean that we have to check the factorization of the polynomial in $\mathbb{C}$ ? (Wondering)

(Nod)
 
I like Serena said:
(Nod)

We have the following: $$x^4-2=(x^2-\sqrt{2})(x^2+\sqrt{2})=(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2})$$ or not?

How could we continue from here? I got stuck right now. (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
We have the following: $$x^4-2=(x^2-\sqrt{2})(x^2+\sqrt{2})=(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2})$$ or not?

How could we continue from here? I got stuck right now. (Wondering)

As you said, we assume that the polynomial $x^4-2$ is reducible over $\mathbb Q(i)$.

Then we must be able to factorize it into $(x-a)p(x)$ or $(x^2+bx+c)q(x)$ with coefficients in $\mathbb Q(i)$.
And since $\mathbb Q(i)$ is a subfield of $\mathbb C$, the factorization must also hold in $\mathbb C[x]$. Furthermore, polynomial factorization over a field is unique up to multiplication with constants.
Is any of the possibilities that you found for $a$ in $\mathbb Q(i)$? (Wondering)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
As you said, we assume that the polynomial $x^4-2$ is reducible over $\mathbb Q(i)$.

Then we must be able to factorize it into $(x-a)p(x)$ or $(x^2+bx+c)q(x)$ with coefficients in $\mathbb Q(i)$.
And since $\mathbb Q(i)$ is a subfield of $\mathbb C$, the factorization must also hold in $\mathbb C[x]$. Furthermore, polynomial factorization over a field is unique up to multiplication with constants.
Is any of the possibilities that you found for $a$ in $\mathbb Q(i)$? (Wondering)

I got stuck right now. I haven't really understood the part with $\mathbb C[x]$. Do we check the factorization of $x^4-2$ in $\mathbb C[x]$ and then we check if one of these is also in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
I got stuck right now. I haven't really understood the part with $\mathbb C[x]$. Do we check the factorization of $x^4-2$ in $\mathbb C[x]$ and then we check if one of these is also in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$ ? (Wondering)

Okay, let's take this step by step...

Klaas van Aarsen said:
As you said, we assume that the polynomial $x^4-2$ is reducible over $\mathbb Q(i)$.

Then we must be able to factorize it into $(x-a)p(x)$ or $(x^2+bx+c)q(x)$ with coefficients in $\mathbb Q(i)$.

This is true, isn't it? (Wondering)

Klaas van Aarsen said:
And since $\mathbb Q(i)$ is a subfield of $\mathbb C$, the factorization must also hold in $\mathbb C[x]$.

If the coefficients are in $\mathbb Q(i)$, then those coefficients are also in $\mathbb C$, aren't they?

Klaas van Aarsen said:
Furthermore, polynomial factorization over a field is unique up to multiplication with constants.

This is also true, isn't it? (Wondering)
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Okay, let's take this step by step...This is true, isn't it? (Wondering)If the coefficients are in $\mathbb Q(i)$, then those coefficients are also in $\mathbb C$, aren't they?This is also true, isn't it? (Wondering)
I think I got that now.

So, we are trying to factorize the polynomial into $(x-a)p(x)$ or $(x^2+bx+c)q(x)$ with coefficients in $\mathbb{C}$ and then these coefficients are also in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ but then we get a contradiction and so it follows that $x^4-2$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.

Have I understood that correctly? (Wondering)
 
  • #10
mathmari said:
I think I got that now.

So, we are trying to factorize the polynomial into $(x-a)p(x)$ or $(x^2+bx+c)q(x)$ with coefficients in $\mathbb{C}$ and then these coefficients are also in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$ but then we get a contradiction and so it follows that $x^4-2$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.

Have I understood that correctly?

Yes. (Nod)

None of the $a$ that you found for $\mathbb C$ is in $\mathbb Q(i)$.
It could still be that there is a reduction over $\mathbb Q(i)$ of the form $(x^2+bx+c)q(x)$ though.
So we also need to check if e.g $(x-\sqrt[4]2)(x+\sqrt[4]2)= (x^2-\sqrt 2)$ has coefficients in $\mathbb Q(i)$. (Thinking)
 
  • #11
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Yes. (Nod)

None of the $a$ that you found for $\mathbb C$ is in $\mathbb Q(i)$.
It could still be that there is a reduction over $\mathbb Q(i)$ of the form $(x^2+bx+c)q(x)$ though.
So we also need to check if e.g $(x-\sqrt[4]2)(x+\sqrt[4]2)= (x^2-\sqrt 2)$ has coefficients in $\mathbb Q(i)$. (Thinking)

So, we assume that $x^4-2$ is reducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$, so also in $\mathbb{C}[x]$.
We consider first the factorizations over $\mathbb{C}$.
We can factorize the polynomial either as $(x^2-\sqrt{2})(x^2+\sqrt{2})$ or as $(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2})$, where the coefficients are in $\mathbb{C}$.
But none of the coefficients is in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.
That means that there is no factorization in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$, and so the polynomial is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$.

Is everything correct and complete? Could I improve something? (Wondering)
 
  • #12
mathmari said:
So, we assume that $x^4-2$ is reducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$, so also in $\mathbb{C}[x]$.
We consider first the factorizations over $\mathbb{C}$.
We can factorize the polynomial either as $(x^2-\sqrt{2})(x^2+\sqrt{2})$ or as $(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2})$, where the coefficients are in $\mathbb{C}$.
But none of the coefficients is in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$.
That means that there is no factorization in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$, and so the polynomial is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$.

Is everything correct and complete? Could I improve something? (Wondering)

It could also be that the expanded forms of $(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})$ or $(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2})$ have coefficients in $\mathbb Q(i)$, which they don't.
We can skip the remaining combinations, since if there was a suitable one, then one of the ones we've checked must also be suitable. (Nerd)
 
  • #13
Klaas van Aarsen said:
It could also be that the expanded forms of $(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})$ or $(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2})$ have coefficients in $\mathbb Q(i)$, which they don't.
We can skip the remaining combinations, since if there was a suitable one, then one of the ones we've checked must also be suitable. (Nerd)

Do you mean the following?

We assume that $x^4-2$ is reducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$ and so it is in $\mathbb{C}[x]$.
We consider first the factorizations over $\mathbb{C}$.
We can write the polynomial either as a product of linear factors: $$(x-\sqrt[4]{2})(x+\sqrt[4]{2})(x-i\sqrt[4]{2})(x+i\sqrt[4]{2})$$ or as a product with a quadratic polynomial: $$[x^2-\sqrt{2}]p(x) \ \text{ or } \ [x^2-(1+i)\sqrt[4]{2}x+i\sqrt{2}]p(x) \ \text{ or } \ [x^2-(1-i)\sqrt[4]{2}x-i\sqrt{2}]p(x)$$ where the coefficients are in $\mathbb{C}$.
But none of these coefficients is in $\mathbb{Q}(i)$, since $\sqrt{2}\notin \mathbb{Q}(i)$, $\sqrt[4]{2}\notin \mathbb{Q}(i)$.
This means that there is no factorization in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$, and so the polynomial $x^4-2$ is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}(i)[x]$.

Is everything correct? (Wondering)
 
  • #14
Yep. (Nod)
 
  • #15
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Yep. (Nod)

Great! At the initial post, do we need the part:
mathmari said:
The polynomial is irreducible in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$ by Eisenstein's criterion with $p=2$.

Then if $a$ is a root of $x^4-2$ then the degree of the extension $\mathbb{Q}(a)$ over the field $\mathbb{Q}$ is $4$ : $[\mathbb{Q}(a):\mathbb{Q}]=4$.

? (Wondering)
 
  • #16
Nope. (Shake)
 
  • #17
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Nope. (Shake)

Ok! Thank you! (Mmm)
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K