The Product of two Unitary Matrices is Unitary Proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The product of two nxn unitary matrices is proven to be unitary through the manipulation of their Hermitian conjugates. The proof utilizes the property that (AB)* = A*B* and the definition of unitary matrices, where A†A = I. The conclusion is reached by demonstrating that (AB)†(AB) = I, confirming that the product AB is unitary. The discussion also raises the question of whether the sum of two unitary matrices retains the unitary property, which remains unproven in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unitary matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with Hermitian conjugates and their notation
  • Knowledge of matrix multiplication and summation notation
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, particularly identity matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Hermitian matrices and their applications
  • Explore the implications of the sum of unitary matrices
  • Study the proof techniques in linear algebra, focusing on matrix identities
  • Learn about the applications of unitary matrices in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in linear algebra, mathematicians studying matrix theory, and anyone interested in the properties of unitary matrices in various mathematical contexts.

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Show that the product of two nxn unitary matrices is unitary. Is the same true of the sum of two nxn unitary matrices?

Homework Equations


Unitary if A†A=I
Where † = hermitian conjugate
I = identity matrix.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
We have the condition: (AB)†(AB)=I
I can then apply summation notation for the elements of the matrices

(AB)^†(AB) = \Big( \sum_{k=1}^j(AB)^†_{ij}(AB)_{ij} \Big)Now, the idea, I suppose, is to manipulate the sum so that we see A^† *A and B^†*B and we can conclude that since A and B are unitary, then A*B is unitary.

This seems coherent, and beautiful.

I assume summation notation is needed to make this distinction. Correct?

And if this is so, I will undo the hermitian conjugate first and then manuever the pieces of the elements.
Correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me write out my proof for checking:

1. (AB)^†(AB)_{ij} = \Big( \sum_{k=1}^j(AB)^†_{ij}(AB)_{ij} \Big)
by element notation
2. (AB)^†(AB)_{ij} = \Big( \sum_{k=1}^j(AB)^*_{ji}(AB)_{ij} \Big)
by hermitian conjugate definition
3. (AB)^†(AB)_{ij} = \Big( \sum_{k=1}^jA^*_{ji}B^*_{ji}A_{ij}B_{ij} \Big)
By proven earlier property that (AB)*=A*B* and earlier proposition that ABij =AijBij
4.(AB)^†(AB)_{ij} = \Big( \sum_{k=1}^jA^*_{ji}A_{ij}B^*_{ji}B_{ij} \Big)
By operations, since we are dealing with components
5.(AB)^†(AB)_{ij} = \Big( \sum_{k=1}^jI_{ij}I_{ij} \Big)
By earlier conditions stating these are two unitary matrices
6. Therefore I_ij = I_ij

And walouh! First part, done.

Any errors in my thinking?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K