MHB The Reflection Property of a Hyperbola

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on seeking a proof of the reflective property of a hyperbola, defined as the locus of points where the difference in distances to two foci is constant. A specific proof is requested that employs geometric definitions and avoids heavy algebra. The reflective property states that a ray from one focus reflects off the hyperbola as if it originated from the other focus. The conversation also touches on the beauty of classical geometry and references a book titled "Geometry of Conics" by Akopyan. The proof approach involves a contradiction method to show that the tangent line at a point bisects the angle formed by the foci.
Evgeny.Makarov
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
2,434
Reaction score
4
Hello,

Does anyone have a reference to a proof of the reflective property of a hyperbola? I need a proof that uses the geometric definition of a hyperbola as the locus of points $X$ such that $|XF_1-XF_2|=2a$ for some fixed points $F_1$ and $F_2$ and a positive constant $a$. The proof may also use elementary geometry but, preferably, no heavy algebra. The reflective property of a hyperbola says that a ray issued from one of the foci and reflected from the hyperbola is seen as issued from the other focus. I have a corresponding proof for an ellipse, but I looked through two of my textbooks and the first page of Google results and did not find a suitable proof for a hyperbola.

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Classical geometry of conic section is a dead subject sadly. When I taught the conic sections before I researched classical geometric proofs of the reflection properties of all three conics and how the locus definition follows from planar intersections of a double-cone. None of which uses coordinates of algebra (which is what makes it classical geometry). It is a very beautiful subject nobody knows anything about, it died back in Greece. The book I used was "Geometry of Conics" by Akopyan to research a little bit of what I was interested in.
----------------------

We want to prove that $\angle F_1 P F_2$ is bisected by the hyperbola. Bisected by the hyperbola means that the tangent line bisects the angle (tangent line not drawn in picture). So we do it by contradiction. We assume that the hyperbola does not bisect the angle i.e. the tangent line does not bisect it. Therefore, the bisection of $\angle F_1 P F_2$ is a secant line to the hyperbola. It will intersect the hyperbola at some other point $Q$, we assume that $Q$ is on the same branch of the hyperbola. We will then need to redo the proof assuming $Q$ is on the other branch of the hyperbola, which we will not do as it will be very similar.

So here is the set up, $\angle F_1 P F_2$, the green angle is bisected by the brown line at another point $Q$ as we are assuming, for the sake of contradiction, the tangent line at $P$ does not bisect angle. Clearly, $F_1$ and $F_2$ are foci of hyperbola.

1) Construct $F$ on segment $F_1P$ so that $PF = PF_2$.
2) By SAS it follows $FQ = F_2Q$.
3) By hyperbola property, $F_1P - PF_2 = F_1Q - F_2Q$.
4) Write $PF_1 = PF + FF_1$.
5) By (2) in (3) we have $F_1P - PF_2 = F_1Q - FQ$
6) Substitute (1) and (4) into (5), $PF + FF_1 - PF = F_1Q - FQ \implies FF_1 = F_1Q-FQ$
7) By $\triangle FF_1Q$ by triangle inequality satisfies $FF_1 > F_1Q - FQ$. Contradiction!
 

Attachments

  • geometry.jpg
    geometry.jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 125
Thanks a lot.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top