The reputation of Macroeconomics has gotten so bad....

  • Thread starter BWV
  • Start date
String theory is so impressive, but it's really just a bunch of equations."In summary, Shalizi argues that sociology is a more fundamental and rigorous field of inquiry than string theory, and that the latter is only impressive because of its mathematical sophistication.
  • #1

BWV

1,434
1,700
that now it is being compared to String Theory, becoming 'mathematical pseudoscience'

(Romer just won the Nobel Prize in Economics)

https://crimfi.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/the_trouble_with_macroeconomics.pdf

The evolution of macroeconomics mirrors developments in string theory from physics, which suggests that they are examples of a general failure mode of for fields of science that rely on mathematical theory in which facts can end up being subordinated to the theoretical preferences of revered leaders. The larger concern is that macroeconomic pseudoscience is undermining the norms of science throughout economics. If so, all of the policy domains that economics touches could lose the accumulation of useful knowledge that characteristic of true science, the greatest human invention.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you took all the economists in Washington DC and placed them end to end, they still wouldn't reach a conclusion.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, Mondayman and russ_watters
  • #3
"To prove that Wall Street is an early omen of movements still to come in GNP, commentators quote economic studies alleging that market downturns predicted four out of the last five recessions. That is an understatement. Wall Street indexes predicted nine out of the last five recessions! And its mistakes were beauties." ~ Paul Samuelson
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b
  • #4
Ok but no reasonable person should expect macroeconomics to predict recessions - after all the prediction itself, if believed by enough people, would be sufficient in itself to cause a recession.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #5
Shots fired at both string theory and macroeconomics...that's efficient.
 
  • #6
BWV said:
that now it is being compared to String Theory, becoming 'mathematical pseudoscience'
But still above sociology I guess?
 
  • Like
Likes BWV
  • #7
russ_watters said:
But still above sociology I guess?

Since you brought up sociology, consider the following blog entry from physicist-turned-statistician (and science blogger) Cosma Shalizi from CMU: "On the Superiority of Sociology to String Theory".

http://bactra.org/weblog/445.html

Note his quote about an (physics) adviser of a friend of his who made the following memorable put-downs:

"I could go crazy tomorrow and find an appointment in the sociology department."

"I don't want to criticize you, but this is the way superstring people think."
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b

Suggested for: The reputation of Macroeconomics has gotten so bad....

Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
77
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
563
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
794
Replies
11
Views
828
Replies
12
Views
755
Back
Top