The Requirement of integer orbitals

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Phyzwizz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer Orbitals
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Phyzwizz
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
If there is a cloud of electrons around an atom than why can't there be orbitals between 1 and 2 or between 2 and 3. I know the probability of an electron being between certain nodes decreases as they approach them but why as the probabilities go away from the perfect orbital do they not become fractional orbitals? (just starting to learn this stuff)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you solve the angular part of the Schrödinger equation in the Coulomb potential (or for any spherically symmetric potential), you'll find that in order to satisfy boundary conditions at [itex]\theta=0[/itex] and [itex]\theta=\pi[/itex] and [itex]\phi=0[/itex] and [itex]\phi=2\pi[/itex], you need to have "integer orbitals" (in your language).
 
Simply because there are no (fractional) integers! The orbitals are labeled by their radial quantum number, n, which is an integer. So while an electron in the n=1 orbital has a finite probability of being found at the most probable radius for an electron in the n=2 orbital, and vice versa, they are distinct quantum states.
 
Anytime you have a bounded system |U|>|E| the eigenvalues will be integral.