Is being nice essential to ethical worth or just a social veneer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter geordief
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
Sign up Log in
4 replies · 4K views
geordief
Messages
230
Reaction score
51
How important is "being nice" in the ethical scheme of things?

In my mind it almost counts as a confusing element that you need to see through to get at the truth (or worth) of an individual.On the other hand ,it can be seen as the final word.

If we were to discover that Winston Churchill had sold his brother into white slavery to fund his education would that totally eclipse the admiration we might otherwise hold him in ? (or is it "in which we hold him", Winnie?)

So is it the icing on the cake ,without which , we have to suspect that the individual doesn't really merit our admiration -or a potential cloak of deceit -a Trojan Horse?

Or is it just a physical/social attribute we just take for the (limited) amount it is worth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Discussion

"Being nice" is an essential part of the human condition (unless you are employed on Wall Street or DC). We all need a level of cooperation and tolerance if our society is to thrive.

Some time ago, I told Evo and MIH that I would stay out of Philosophy. Hope I don't get banned.
 
Nature is not kind;
It treats all things impartially.
The Sage is not kind,
And treats all people impartially.
Nature is like a bellows,
Empty, yet never ceasing its supply.
The more it moves, the more it yields;
So the sage draws upon experience
And cannot be exhausted.
Lao Tzu

To a lot of Taoists kindness is merely a social convention that can vary from one culture to the next. Instead they emphasis compassion and noncontention.
 
This thread does not meet the minimum requirements to post in this section. Please be sure to read both sets of rules stickied at the top of the philosophy forum. Rules must be followed when posting.