The Sun's Fire: Low O2 and Carbon Emissions

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gokhul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Emissions Fire
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of the Sun and the concept of "fire" in relation to its composition and the processes occurring within it. Participants explore the implications of low oxygen and carbon levels in the Sun, questioning how it can be described as "fire" and addressing the mechanisms that generate its heat, primarily nuclear fusion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the Sun contains only 0.77% oxygen and 0.29% carbon, questioning how it can be surrounded by "fire" with such low emissions of carbon.
  • Others argue that the Sun's "fire" is not traditional combustion but rather the result of nuclear fusion occurring in its core, which generates the heat that makes it appear as a glowing ball.
  • There is a clarification that the Sun does not have flames in the conventional sense, as there is no combustion taking place due to the lack of oxygen.
  • Some participants mention the Sun's corona, which is significantly hotter than its surface, and discuss the role of magnetic fields in this phenomenon.
  • Questions arise about how objects, such as spaceships or comets, behave when approaching the Sun, with some asserting that they do not catch fire but may melt or vaporize due to high temperatures.
  • There is a discussion about the state of matter on the Sun's surface, with references to Boltzmann statistics and the predominance of gas versus plasma phases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition of "fire" in the context of the Sun, with some agreeing that traditional combustion does not occur while others debate the implications of this on the understanding of the Sun's appearance and behavior. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the terminology and conceptual understanding of the Sun's processes.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of fire and combustion, as well as the assumptions about the behavior of materials near the Sun. The role of nuclear fusion and the conditions under which objects may melt or vaporize are also points of contention.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying astrophysics, thermodynamics, or anyone curious about the nature of stars and the processes that govern their behavior.

gokhul
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
There is only 0.77% of oxygen in sun
And only 0.29% of carbon
The question is
there is only small amount of o2 but how how sun is surrounded by fire with very less emissions of carbon
( referred to Wikipedia for amount of gas in sun)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sun is surrounded by fire in that it is surrounded by gas that's hot enough to be glowing red (which is as good a definition for fire as any). Some of it's even hot enough to be plasma, but that's not the point to be made here.

Even though there's probably no significant amounts of chemical combustion going on, the nuclear fusion at the core certainly keeps the rest of the Sun hot enough to be the glowing ball of "fire" we see.
 
gokhul said:
The question is
there is only small amount of o2 but how how sun is surrounded by fire with very less emissions of carbon
( referred to Wikipedia for amount of gas in sun)

its not fire in the sense of what is usually termed fire as the fire in a furnace or your home fireplace
nothing is burning, there are NO flames. As you noted, O2 is almost non-existent

The heat from the sun is primarily caused by the nuclear reactions occurring in its core.
An interesting feature is the Suns corona which varies from 1 to 3 million Kelvin, very much hotter than the photosphere surface
that is around 5800 K
The jury is still out on all the causes for this, but the sun's magnetic fields do play a part.
jfizzix said:
The sun is surrounded by fire in that it is surrounded by gas that's hot enough to be glowing red (which is as good a definition for fire as any).

that is incorrect and quite misleading

jfizzix said:
Even though there's probably no significant amounts of chemical combustion going on

there is no combustion going on
regards
Dave
 
davenn said:
its not fire in the sense of what is usually termed fire as the fire in a furnace or your home fireplace
nothing is burning, there are NO flames. As you noted, O2 is almost non-existent

The heat from the sun is primarily caused by the nuclear reactions occurring in its core.
An interesting feature is the Suns corona which varies from 1 to 3 million Kelvin, very much hotter than the photosphere surface
that is around 5800 K
The jury is still out on all the causes for this, but the sun's magnetic fields do play a part.

that is incorrect and quite misleading
there is no combustion going on
regards
Dave
Then how when objects get near catch up flame
 
davenn said:
its not fire in the sense of what is usually termed fire as the fire in a furnace or your home fireplace
nothing is burning, there are NO flames. As you noted, O2 is almost non-existent

The heat from the sun is primarily caused by the nuclear reactions occurring in its core.
An interesting feature is the Suns corona which varies from 1 to 3 million Kelvin, very much hotter than the photosphere surface
that is around 5800 K
The jury is still out on all the causes for this, but the sun's magnetic fields do play a part.

that is incorrect and quite misleading
there is no combustion going on
regards
Dave
And what type of nuclear reaction takes place fission or fussion
 
gokhul said:
Then how when objects get near catch up flame

Get near what? The Sun?

gokhul said:
And what type of nuclear reaction takes place fission or fussion

Fusion reactions occur in the Sun's core.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Core
 
gokhul said:
Then how when objects get near catch up flame

what objects ?
 
davenn said:
what objects ?
space ships or comets
 
Okay, I'm here to learn as much as anyone else (mea culpa).

Are you saying that fire is not red-hot gas,
or that the Sun is not surrounded by gas?

Not counting the corona (which doesn't produce most of the light we see anyway)
the surface of the Sun's a mix of hot gas, and gas hot enough to become a plasma
If you work out the Boltzmann statistics for hydrogen gas, at around 5800K, you'll find that most of the surface of the sun's in the gas phase, and not in the plasma phase.
 
  • #10
jfizzix said:
Okay, I'm here to learn as much as anyone else (mea culpa).

Are you saying that fire is not red-hot gas,
or that the Sun is not surrounded by gas?
I don't know if this is what @davenn had in mind, but I would also not call it fire, as there is no combustion taking place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #11
gokhul said:
space ships or comets

spaceships ? ... well don't think any made on Earth have ever got close enough to the sun to worry about
I can't find any specific info links, maybe others more informed than me can confirm my thoughts :smile: @DrClaude , @mfb

spacecraft will be mainly metal and maybe some tanks of fuel and other than those fuel tanks exploding when the contents reaches ignition temperature
all the remaining metallic parts would simply melt and vaporise

The similar thing I suspect would happen to comets and meteoroids
Comets are mainly lumps of rock dust and ice. The ices are going to vent from the comet, melt and vaporise
Trapped pockets of ice and gasses could well cause lots of rock fracturing to occur, breaking sections of the comet apart
but in the end, the rock or ice is going to melt and vaporise once the required temperatures are reached

Regards
Dave
 
  • #12
gokhul said:
Then how when objects get near catch up flame
They don't, what has given you this idea?
No comet or other object approaching the Sun will catch fire because there is no oxygen in space.
They can get very hot though due to direct solar radiation, and comets have been seen to disintegrate.
These basically melted and fell apart, they didn't catch fire in the normal use of the word 'fire' (=combustion).

Also there are no flames around the sun, what you are seeing is electromagnetic radiation (light) which is generated by the fusion reactions in the Sun's core. (You can also directly feel infrared radiation from the Sun as heat on a clear hot day.)
 
Last edited:
  • #13
jfizzix said:
If you work out the Boltzmann statistics for hydrogen gas, at around 5800K, you'll find that most of the surface of the sun's in the gas phase, and not in the plasma phase.
It is called plasma even if most atoms are neutral, as long as the ionized atoms and electrons dominate the behavior of the matter (and they certainly do that in the sun).
gokhul said:
Then how when objects get near catch up flame
They do not. They can melt and evaporate, depending on their chemical composition some chemical reactions might take place, but unless you carry around oxygen in the spacecraft (or comet) no combustion with oxygen happens.
 
  • #14
mfb said:
They do not. They can melt and evaporate, depending on their chemical composition some chemical reactions might take place, but unless you carry around oxygen in the spacecraft (or comet) no combustion with oxygen happens.


cool, so I covered it pretty well :smile:


Dave
 
  • #15
I stand corrected
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K