Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS)

  1. Sep 20, 2006 #1


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor



    The SNLS survey consists of:

    A large imaging survey at CFHT
    The CFHT Legacy Survey aims at detecting and monitoring about 2000 supernovae with Megaprime at the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope between 2003 and 2008.​

    A large spectroscopic survey
    Hi-z spectroscopy of SNe is being carried on 8m class telescopes (Gemini, VLT, Keck). The primary goal is to obtain Supernova identification and redshift. Detailed spectroscopy of a subsample of distant SNe is also done to validate the use of Type Ia SNe as cosmological candles. ​

    This program yielded information on SNLS-03D3bb.
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 22, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 22, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    A very interesting programme - the work that will be done to characterise, in considerably more detail, the distant type 1a SNe is just what's needed to constrain many possible systematics for these (i.e. just how 'standard' they are, as candles). This will be particularly welcome, given that computer-based simulations/models of these are still not good enough (for the full 'standard candle' use).
  4. Sep 24, 2006 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Is this a high redshift project competing with the Supernova Cosmology Project? Or are they somehow complementary?
  5. Sep 26, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This >2MB PDF from a member of the SNLS team (a poster at the 207th AAS meeting, in Jan this year) puts it rather nicely: "After just over 2 years of operation, the SNLS is already outperforming all previous ground-based high-z SN surveys." (though if you look more closely, you'll see much collaboration).

    The design is different from earlier teams', and (one could argue) more robust, and more efficient (not to mention having a great deal more dark time available, on many different 8-10m class observatories!).
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: The Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS)
  1. Sky survey (Replies: 1)

  2. Supernova shockwave (Replies: 6)

  3. Energy in supernovae (Replies: 2)

  4. Supernova in M82 (Replies: 18)