The Two forms of Maxwell's equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the visualization and understanding of Maxwell's equations, specifically the relationship between the integral and differential forms. The user expresses confusion regarding the divergence and curl operators, particularly how they relate to the closed loop integral of the electric field (E) and the flux through a surface. It is clarified that the divergence represents the flux through an infinitesimal closed surface, while the curl corresponds to a closed line integral, both of which are essential in interpreting Maxwell's equations. The user concludes that these concepts require patience and repeated study for full comprehension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with vector calculus concepts such as divergence and curl
  • Knowledge of integral and differential forms in physics
  • Basic grasp of electric field (E) and flux concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integral form of Maxwell's equations in detail
  • Learn about vector calculus, focusing on divergence and curl
  • Explore the physical interpretations of electric field flux
  • Review Ampere's law and its relationship to curl
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators explaining Maxwell's equations, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of vector calculus in physical contexts.

DeepSeeded
Messages
113
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I was tempted to put this in the math section but it is more of a visualization problem though it is most likley due to my lack of understanding the divergence and curl operators fully.

I am comfortable with the closed loop integral of E dot dA and can visualize it as a solid closed surface. However when I think of the divergence of the E vector I think of a tiny little piece of the E vector.

How can these be the same thing?

Same goes for the Curl vector being the same as the closed loop integral of a line.

In 8.02 they used the integral form, in 8.03 they are using the differential form and now I am confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral of the E dot dA is not a surface but the flux through that surface. You can visualize it as the "amount of field" crossing the surface. This is not the same as the divergence but same as the integral of the divergence over the volume included in the surface.
The divergence is the flux through a tiny, infinitesimal, closed surface (divided by the volume inside the surface). By integration of the divergence over the volume you just add all these fluxes inside the volume included by the surface and end up with the "total" (net) flux through the surface.

You can write Maxwell equations in differential or integral form. It does not follow that the flux is equal to the divergence.
 
OK, my misunderstanding was that the definition of the divergence is an infinitsmal sphere which is closed and not an open point. I see that it says this now on wikipedia but it was not so clear.

Looks like the definition of the curl is an infinitsmal closed line integral which also works to explain Ampere's laws.

I think I am getting it now, thank you.
 
Those ideas are subtle and require some attention and patience when your firstencounter them. Try looking for other interpretations and explanations and reread the ones you like several times over a few days...took awhile to for those ideas to sink in for me...

I'm always amazed at the people who first dreamed these kinds of things up...pretty classy!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
591
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
670