I The Ultimate Symmetry of a Mirror Universe

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Quarker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetry
Quarker
Messages
103
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
Why not a duplicate, mirror-image anti-matter universe?
After countless google searches, I decided to ask the experts. The multiverse idea seems to be popular among physicists, but the idea of a mirror universe seems much more plausible. Like quantum theory, it’s symmetrical. For every quantum fluctuation in our universe, there would be an equal and “opposite” fluctuation in a mirror universe, down to the last neutrino. Imagine a two-sided quantum field. Virtual particles always appear in pairs, why wouldn’t real particle also be paired? Wouldn’t the left-handed weak force still function in both universes, but in mirror-image form? Is there any known physics that would prohibit such a state? Assuming that the particles in the mirror universe aren’t the bearded, evil twins of our own (the Roddenberry hypothesis).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quarker said:
Summary:: Why not a duplicate, mirror-image anti-matter universe?

Assuming that the particles in the mirror universe aren’t the bearded, evil twins of our own (the Roddenberry hypothesis).
So, at this moment, has some anti-universe poster written "Assuming the particles in the mirror universe aren't the clean-shaven, evil twins of our own ?"
 
Quarker said:
Summary:: Why not a duplicate, mirror-image anti-matter universe?
:welcome:

It will be interesting to see what an "expert" makes of your question!
 
I'm afraid we do not discuss personal theories on PF. The more as there isn't the least chance to discuss it scientifically.

Thread closed.
 

Thread 'Detecting Gravitons?'

I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
View full post »

Thread 'Inertial mass, the Higgs field, and Mach's Principle'

I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Some questions about Coleman's Baby Universe model
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Is the CPT-Symmetric Universe Theory the Key to Solving the Antimatter Mystery?
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Was the Big Bang a quantum mechanical vacuum fluctuation?
2
Replies
85
Views
12K
A How can modular forms be used in particle physics mass models?
Replies
7
Views
5K
A Higgs inflation and quadratic gravity
Replies
1
Views
3K
A "The 7 Strangest Coincidences in the Laws of Nature" (S. Hossenfelder)
2
Replies
62
Views
9K
I A novel explanation of CKM and PMNS matrix parameters
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Multiverse theory, I dont like it...
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Zero-Energy Universe: Reliable Source?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I A Bold New Take on Quantum Theory
Replies
25
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top