The vector potential and the Hamiltonian?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Hamiltonian formulation of a particle with mass m and charge q in an external field characterized by vector potential A and scalar potential X. The Hamiltonian is defined as H(r,p) = (1/2m)[p - qA(r,t)]² + qX(r,t). The user successfully applies Hamilton's equations of motion to derive the velocity and force equations, ultimately leading to the expression for the time derivative of the vector potential, \dot{A} = \partial_t A + (v \bullet \nabla)A. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the chain rule in index notation to simplify the derivation of \dot{A}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics and Hamilton's equations
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, particularly the gradient operator
  • Knowledge of classical electromagnetism, specifically vector and scalar potentials
  • Proficiency in differential equations and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hamiltonian mechanics in detail, focusing on applications in electromagnetism
  • Learn about the chain rule in vector calculus and its implications in physics
  • Explore the relationship between vector potentials and electromagnetic fields
  • Investigate advanced topics in classical mechanics, such as Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, researchers in classical mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of electromagnetism and Hamiltonian dynamics.

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Hi,
I have a problem involving the Hamiltonian of a particle of mass m, charge q, position r, momentum p, in an external field defined by vector potential A and scalar potential X. Here's the Hamiltonian:

H(r,p) = (1/2m)[p - qA(r,t)]2 + qX(r,t) = (1/2m)(pjpj - 2qpjAj + q2AjAj) + qX

The problem I have to solve is that i have to show that

[tex]\dot{A}[/tex] = [tex]\partial _{t} A + (v \bullet \nabla)A[/tex]

My attempted solution:

When I put this into Hamilton's equations of motion, (which are the following:)

[tex]\frac{dr_{j}}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_{j}}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{dp_{j}}{dt} = - \frac{\partial H}{\partial r_{j}}[/tex]

I get : [tex]\ \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_{j}} = (1/m)(p_{j} - qA_{j}) = \frac{dr_{j}}{dt} = v_{j}[/tex]

and : [tex]\ \frac{\partial H}{\partial r_{j}} = (\frac{q^{2}A_{j}}{m} - \frac{qp_{j}}{m})\frac{\partial A_{j}}{\partial r_{j}} + q\frac{\partial X}{\partial r_{j}}= - \frac{dp_{j}}{dt} = F_{j}[/tex]

I am 99% certain these are correct.



Using what I got for the first differential equation, i find that A_{j}=(1/q)(p_{j} - mv_{j})

hence [tex]\ \dot{A} = \frac{1}{q}(\frac{dp_{j}}{dt} - m\frac{dv_{j}}{dt})[/tex]

[tex]\ = \frac{1}{q}((-(\frac{q^2A_{j}}{m} - \frac{qp_{j}}{m})\frac{dA_{j}}{dr_{j}} + q\frac{\partial X}{\partial r_{j}}) - m\frac{dv_{j}}{t})[/tex]

[tex]\ = (\frac{p_{j}}{m} - \frac{qA_{j}}{m})\frac{\partial A_{j}}{\partial r_{j}} - \frac{\partial X}{\partial r_{j}} - m\frac{dv_{j}}{dt})[/tex]

[tex]\ = (v_{j}.\nabla)A_{j} - \frac{\partial X}{\partial r_{j}} - m\frac{dv_{j}}{dt}[/tex]

and this is as far as I get really.

First off, am I correct in the way i got to the (v.\nabla) part? (ie. using the first Hamilton equation for velocity?)

Assuming that is correct, I haven't been able to find a way to deal with the other terms in the equation... the advice given on the question sheet is to use the chain rule in index notation, but I don't see where this comes in handy for this question.

Can anyone offer any advice on how to tackle this one?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're making things much too complicated...[itex]A[/itex] is a function of [itex]r_i[/itex] and [itex]t[/itex], so the chain rule tells you

[tex]\dot{A}=\frac{dA}{dt}=\partial_t A+\frac{dr_i}{dt}\frac{\partial A}{\partial r_i}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K