The Wave Condition: Fixed Ends and Open Ends

  • Thread starter Thread starter jwxie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Wave
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around wave conditions at fixed and open ends, specifically focusing on the implications of boundary conditions on wave behavior and harmonic frequencies. Participants explore the relationships between fixed and free ends, the interpretation of slope conditions, and the determination of nodes in standing waves.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the meaning of slope conditions and how they relate to fixed and free ends. They discuss the implications of different boundary conditions on wave behavior and the existence of nodes. There is also exploration of how to sketch harmonics based on these conditions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the interpretation of slope conditions and their effects on wave properties. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of fixed versus free ends, but multiple interpretations of the examples presented are still being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that additional conditions may be necessary to determine the number of nodes and to accurately sketch waveforms, indicating that the current information may be insufficient for complete understanding.

jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is what my professor wrote on the board.

Suppose the condition is as follows
[tex]y(0) = y(L) = 0[/tex]
link to img http://www.izhuk.com/painter/image2.php?id=1286387629-69-86-215-102&md5=c054d375567134a9faa133b47fe690b2

This is the fundamental harmonic - with nodes appear at x = 0, and x = L

Suppose we have this condition
[tex]\[y(0) = 0, y(L)\neq 0, (\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})_{x=L} = 0 \][/tex]

This gives the following image
http://www.izhuk.com/painter/image2.php?id=1286388050-69-86-215-102&md5=692154459be86cc180d82606991495b4

He said that the right end is not fixed, hence the slope of the changes in y position is not zero.

With the same condition, but a different drawing,
http://www.izhuk.com/painter/image2.php?id=1286388170-69-86-215-102&md5=02de08db7ca943b3db1a1bc46e82336a
This clearly shows that lambada is = 4L, with node appears only at x = 0. In another note he wrote (for standing waves in air column)

both ends open
http://www.izhuk.com/painter/image2.php?id=1286388281-69-86-215-102&md5=3ae6bc9e3abf91f224af13248936939d
for the condition:
[tex]\[(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})_{x=0} = 0 ,(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})_{x=L} = 0 \][/tex]Open-closed
http://www.izhuk.com/painter/image2.php?id=1286388380-69-86-215-102&md5=50d9cdfa58763dd2dc70314d65a837c4

For the condition
[tex]\[(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})_{x=0} = 0, y(x = L) = 0\][/tex] and the lambada is 4LMy question is, how do you read the slope form that he wrote. So if the slope changes is equal to zero, then it mean that end is fixed? Obviously, the first two examples do not agree with the interpretation of the last two.
Moreover, if I were to sketch based on the condition, how do I determine the lambada? I don't see how knowing either end being fixed help me sketch which harmonics.

Thank you.

From other notes he had other examples such as
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jwxie said:
My question is, how do you read the slope form that he wrote.
It's hard to understand what you're asking because you're kind of throwing words together. What do you mean by "slope changes," "slope of the changes in y position", and "slope form"? Do you just mean the slope, ∂y/∂x?
So if the slope changes is equal to zero, then it mean that end is fixed?
If the end is fixed, that end can't move, so y=0 at that end. If the end is free, then the partial derivative ∂y/∂x vanishes at that end.
Obviously, the first two examples do not agree with the interpretation of the last two.
I don't see the contradiction between the first two and the last two. Can you elaborate on how they do not agree?
Moreover, if I were to sketch based on the condition, how do I determine the lambada? I don't see how knowing either end being fixed help me sketch which harmonics.

Thank you.

From other notes he had other examples such as
 
Hi, thank you for the reply.

Let's talk about the partial first.

so we have ∂y/∂x = 0 (let say at x = 0). Then it means at x = 0 (the left end, let say) is free, not fixed?

Second question is:

How do you determine the numbers of nodes? In another word, with that same conditions [∂y/∂x = 0 (let say at x = 0)], I can sketch the fundamental harmonics with normal mode n = 1, and L = 1/2 lambada, or I can have n = 2, with L = lambada. So there is no way to determine the numbers of nodes and no way to sketch a figure unless additional condition is given?
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's right. If the medium were fixed at x=0, it can't move, so y(0,t)=0 for all t, but you'd have no condition on ∂y/∂x. With a free end, the partial derivative ∂y/∂x must vanish, but there's no condition on y.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K