The way mathematics should be taught

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nano-Passion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
Nano-Passion
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
0
It bugs me how terrible my math classes were in grammar and high school. Many teach the beauty of mathematics at a superficial level. They simply teach you formulas largely through memorization. When it should be taught through assisted self-discovery, showing the bigger picture, etc..

At grammar school the following formula was slapped on the black board: c^2=a^2+b^2

All I saw was a bunch of letters and numbers, no beauty or "coolness factor" was discovered.

If it was taught the reasoning of it all through the teacher slowly showing us why c^2=a^2+b^2 I would have developed a liking towards the concept. Such as with
pythagorean2.png


Or through assisted self-discovery was taught the beauty of pi by the following dialogue and reasoning: http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/piorigin/piorigin.html

I would have seen more of the beauty of mathematics much earlier.

Seriously now, one of the reason that mathematics isn't one of the more popular fields is because the beauty is much more obscure and only gives itself up under careful scrutiny. It is much easier to develop a connection with other fields (psychology, etc.) because there is an immediate visible connection to the outside world.

Taking mathematics out of context and slapping formulas simply does no merit to the potential beauty that is often hidden by bad teaching.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nano-Passion said:
It bugs me how terrible my math classes were in grammar and high school. Many teach the beauty of mathematics at a superficial level. They simply teach you formulas largely through memorization. When it should be taught through assisted self-discovery, showing the bigger picture, etc..

At grammar school the following formula was slapped on the black board: c^2=a^2+b^2

All I saw was a bunch of letters and numbers, no beauty or "coolness factor" was discovered.

If it was taught the reasoning of it all through the teacher slowly showing us why c^2=a^2+b^2 I would have developed a liking towards the concept. Such as with
pythagorean2.png


Or through assisted self-discovery was taught the beauty of pi by the following dialogue and reasoning: http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/piorigin/piorigin.html

I would have seen more of the beauty of mathematics much earlier.

Seriously now, one of the reason that mathematics isn't one of the more popular fields is because the beauty is much more obscure and only gives itself up under careful scrutiny. It is much easier to develop a connection with other fields (psychology, etc.) because there is an immediate visible connection to the outside world.

Taking mathematics out of context and slapping formulas simply does no merit to the potential beauty that is often hidden by bad teaching.

I think you are right but the real problem in my opinion is not teaching people how to think mathematically. Even a bad math text will reveal beauty to someone who knows how to think mathematically.
 
One thing you should note is that a lot of math teachers in pre-tertiary study do not have the background to teach in this context: most people with masters or other post graduate qualifications do not go into high school (and I don't blame them), and even those with bachelors tend not to go into teaching.