The World's Largest Computer in 1951

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around two significant machines: the ENIAC, an early computer that was 10 feet tall, weighed 30 tons, and required 150 kilowatts of power, and the Russian Ekranoplan, a ground effect vehicle that could travel over 400 km/h and weighed 540 tons. The ENIAC utilized a vast number of electronic components but had less processing power than a modern pocket calculator. The Ekranoplan, developed by the Soviet Union, operates just above water using a shock wave principle, allowing it to travel over various terrains. The conversation also touches on trivia and historical facts about these machines, highlighting their unique engineering and capabilities. Overall, the thread showcases a blend of technical details and engaging quiz-like interactions.
  • #1,411
Andy said:
silly tossars.
Don't start! Could take me months to figure out what "tossars" are!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,412
The results of this experiment were so conclusive that the last doubters of atomic theory were forced to surrender. What was the experiment?
 
  • #1,413
A still...?

correct.
 
  • #1,414
brewnog said:
No worries, I'm still happy that we are allowed to say "wanker" in here without Evo telling us off!
That's nuthin'; I seem to remember you getting away with 'twat'.

zoobyshoe said:
The results of this experiment were so conclusive that the last doubters of atomic theory were forced to surrender. What was the experiment?
Hiroshima?
 
  • #1,415
Danger said:
Hiroshima?
Negatory..
 
  • #1,416
Rutherford and his gold foil?

I'm just saying that because I had an exam in his lecture hall the other day.
 
  • #1,417
brewnog said:
Rutherford and his gold foil?

I'm just saying that because I had an exam in his lecture hall the other day.
Good reason. Wrong experiment.
 
  • #1,418
Curie's radium salts and film discovery?
 
  • #1,419
Danger said:
Curie's radium salts and film discovery?
No. But I'd say everyone's in the right, very general, ballpark.
 
  • #1,420
!911 Rutherford used alpha particle beam to test for atomic structure
he termed the center of the atom, nucleus.
 
  • #1,421
wolram said:
!911 Rutherford used alpha particle beam to test for atomic structure
he termed the center of the atom, nucleus.
Brewnog already guessed Rutherford.

You guys are thinking too positively. Think negative.
 
  • #1,422
Thomson and his CRT?
 
  • #1,423
You guys are thinking too positively. Think negative.

Ok, there is no way i can crack this one.
 
  • #1,424
brewnog said:
Thomson and his CRT?
Nope. Still right ball park.
 
  • #1,425
Chadwick and his cloud chambers?
 
  • #1,426
Ions were first theorized by Michael Faraday around 1830, to describe the portions of molecules that travel either to an anode or to a cathode.
 
  • #1,427
brewnog said:
Chadwick and his cloud chambers?
No.
wolram said:
Ions were first theorized by Michael Faraday around 1830, to describe the portions of molecules that travel either to an anode or to a cathode.
Also no.
 
  • #1,428
The experiment involved a short focus telescope.
 
  • #1,429
William Crooke's vacuum tubes?
 
  • #1,430
brewnog said:
William Crooke's vacuum tubes?
No. The experiment also involved an electric field.
 
  • #1,431
Millikan's Oil Drop!
 
  • #1,432
brewnog said:
Millikan's Oil Drop!
Indeed!
 
  • #1,433
Woo! Throw enough cack around and some of it's bound to stick!


Ok, I've almost got a good clue coming up...
 
  • #1,434
brewnog said:
Woo! Throw enough cack around and some of it's bound to stick!


Ok, I've almost got a good clue coming up...
I thought that was your clue.
 
  • #1,435
Danger said:
I thought that was your clue.

Nah, that would have been too easy. (Artman's bedroom again, I believe).

Ok.

What is shown in the picture?

http://personalpages.umist.ac.uk/student/E.Smith-2/whatisthis.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,436
Freshly harvested cauliflowers
 
  • #1,437
zoobyshoe said:
Freshly harvested cauliflowers

No.

But I was hoping you'd say that. :smile:
 
  • #1,438
A fun intermediary question to pass the time

This is a rehash of an older question

When I first stated I was 18436572 then I went to 18726543, my cousin started at 15426378 then went to 13726548, and a third cousin of mine has stayed at 18436572. What am I and who are my cousins?

enjoy
 
  • #1,439
Freshly sheered wool
 
  • #1,440
zoobyshoe said:
Freshly sheered wool
Nope. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Is Alan Turing given too much credit when it comes to computers?
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
How to compute flexure and failure loads of acrylic sheets
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K