Could floating cities become a reality using rocket boosters?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of floating cities utilizing rocket boosters for levitation. Participants propose that rocket boosters, operating at a velocity of 9.9 m/s, could theoretically create enough lift to support a city. However, concerns arise regarding the toxic fumes produced by such boosters and the high costs associated with this technology. Alternatives, such as using hydrogen or helium gasbags for buoyancy, are suggested as more practical solutions for maintaining airborne structures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rocket propulsion principles
  • Knowledge of gas buoyancy and properties of hydrogen and helium
  • Familiarity with environmental impacts of rocket emissions
  • Basic engineering concepts related to structural support and weight distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the engineering principles behind rocket propulsion systems
  • Explore the environmental effects of rocket launches and potential mitigation strategies
  • Learn about the properties and applications of hydrogen and helium in buoyancy
  • Investigate existing concepts and designs for airborne habitats or floating cities
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, environmental scientists, urban planners, and anyone interested in innovative architectural solutions for future living environments.

SteveManPhy076
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Could there perhaps ever be floating cities? If we could get the type of technology that sends rockets into space, and have the boosters running at a constant and equal velocity inversely, could this cause anything to levitate? If so, would this even be habitable? Considering that the fumes given off by such boosters is toxic, would there be a way to disperse of the fumes? In addition, this would be quite costly and probably not worth it.

To expound, it would work with rocket boosters on top of a piece of land pushing downward with a velocity of at least 9.9m/s, and boosters at the bottom of a piece of land with a velocity of at least 9.9m/s.

What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you really wanted something the size of a city to float in the atmosphere it would be far simpler and a lot cheaper to keep it airborne by means of hydrogen or helium gasbags rather than by using rockets.
It's probably feasible from an engineering perspective, but why we should want to float a city in the atmosphere escapes me.
Cities generally are built in locations which are good for agriculture, or there are valuable resources, or at the intersection of trading routes, or are convenient seaports.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
19K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K