Theoretical mathmatics for physics phd

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the educational path for pursuing a PhD in physics, particularly in quantum theory and string theory. Participants explore the relevance of a B.S. in theoretical mathematics versus applied mathematics, and the specific mathematical courses that may be beneficial for this field of study.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the necessity of a B.S. in theoretical mathematics for a PhD in quantum theory/string theory, expressing uncertainty between choosing applied or theoretical mathematics.
  • Another participant suggests that the choice may depend on the specific courses available in each degree, noting that applied mathematics might offer similar courses to theoretical mathematics.
  • Several participants observe that there are multiple threads on this topic, indicating a common interest in becoming theoretical physicists.
  • One participant discusses the importance of taking specific courses such as discrete mathematics, numerical analysis, and dynamical systems, while considering the connections between physics and both branches of mathematics.
  • A participant outlines foundational courses common to both degrees, such as analysis, calculus, and linear algebra, and emphasizes the need for advanced topics like quantum field theory and general relativity for a PhD in quantum gravity.
  • Another participant questions whether mathematics can facilitate conceptual thought in physics research, pondering its role in generating new ideas.
  • A later reply challenges the notion that mathematics alone can lead to new ideas in physics, stressing the importance of a strong foundation in both mathematics and physics for researchers in these fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and utility of a theoretical mathematics degree versus applied mathematics, as well as the role of mathematics in conceptualizing new physics ideas. There is no consensus on the best educational path or the sufficiency of mathematics alone for generating new physics concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various mathematical topics and their relevance to physics without resolving the specific requirements or preferences for a PhD program. The discussion reflects a range of opinions on the relationship between mathematics and physics research.

strings235
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
hey everyone,

If I plan to pursue a physics phd in quantum theory/string theory do you recommend I get a B.S. in theoretical mathematics as well (with linear pde, Fourier anal, and topology, etc.)?

I'm still not sure whether applied or theoretical math is the better choice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it depends upon what specific courses you will be taking in each degree-- for example, in applied, you may be able to take many of the courses you can in theoretical. I'm not really sure what the content of a "theoretical mathematics" course would be though.
 
jesus christ there's like 5 of these threads already in here
 
ice109 said:
jesus christ there's like 5 of these threads already in here

Yea, I thought that. It seems that there are a lot of people keen to become theoretical physicists at the moment.
 
well there actually are categories. I was thinking about discrete mathematics, numerical analysis, dynamical systems, etc. But there are many connections between physics and both applied and theoretical math so I was thinking of taking individual courses and not taking a whole major where I might be studying unnecessary courses.

So are there any specific courses that are needed, useful, or desirable in the fields I mentioned?
 
Well, I presume the first few years of each degree are pretty much the same; i.e. analysis, calculus, algebra, differential equations, linear algebra, basic probability. You could then look into a course in PDE's, complex analysis. Now, if you really want to do a PhD in quantum gravity (let's not call it string theory, since no one knows what will happen in the next few years!) you'll need to know quantum field theory and general relativity. The former requires quantum theory and special relativity, of which the main mathematical techniques you will need to know are linear algebra and differential equations. The latter requires mathematical knowledge of differential geometry and tensor calculus.

I would suggest that you talk to the admissions tutor at the establishemtn where you wish to undertake study and find out, firstly, the difference between the degrees, and secondly, which would be preferential for you selected PhD route.
 
thanks. and I was wondering if mathematics can aid in conceptual thought for research. essentially coming up with new ideas in physics through mathematics.
 
strings235 said:
thanks. and I was wondering if mathematics can aid in conceptual thought for research. essentially coming up with new ideas in physics through mathematics.

that it will not do
 
strings235 said:
thanks. and I was wondering if mathematics can aid in conceptual thought for research. essentially coming up with new ideas in physics through mathematics.

I wouldn't say that you would be able to "come up with new ideas in physics" using solely mathematics (although, of course, it depends what you mean by "mathematics"-- I learned quantum theory and GR as part of my undergrad maths degree). However, a firm grounding in mathematics is imperative. That's why the researchers in these fields are both strong mathematicians, but have a thorough knowledge of the relevant physics also.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K