Theoretical physics at Uppsala University

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical physics program at Uppsala University, which ranks between 60-120 globally for physics and astronomy. The participant emphasizes that university rankings are not the sole indicator of program quality, particularly for fields like string theory and physics beyond the standard model. They argue that personal effort and resource utilization are more critical than institutional prestige. The participant also shares their experience at EPFL, highlighting that the quality of education can be similar across institutions regardless of ranking.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of university ranking systems and their implications.
  • Familiarity with theoretical physics concepts, particularly string theory.
  • Knowledge of research opportunities in physics programs.
  • Awareness of the importance of faculty quality and campus resources.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the theoretical physics curriculum at Uppsala University.
  • Explore the string theory research initiatives at University College London.
  • Investigate the physics program at The University of Edinburgh for comparative analysis.
  • Assess the faculty qualifications and research output at various universities.
USEFUL FOR

Prospective physics students, academic advisors, and anyone evaluating the importance of university rankings versus program quality in theoretical physics.

annihilatorM
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I have been accepted to the the theoretical physics program at Uppsala University. It ranks around 60-120 in the world for physics and astronomy. I know these rankings aren't the best metric to determine how good a program is, but it gives me an idea. I want to know how good the program is for theoretical physics, I'm interested in string theory and physics beyond the standard model. I'm pretty sure I can get into better universities, is it important that I get into the "best" university that I can? I'm thinking about applying to University College London and The University of Edinburgh.
 
Ranking doesn't mean much honestly. If student A is lazy and doesn't make use of all the tools at his disposal, the ranking won't save him. On the other hand, a hard-working bright student B at a college ranked worse than the college of student A will probably achieve good to outstanding work in his field.
What matters is not what others have done in your college, it's what you will do in it that actually matters. As long as the college is decent (i.e. the bachelor is valid and there's research going on) the ranking won't change much. As a personal example I'm studying in Switzerland at the EPFL which is very well ranked, but I have study sessions with people from Geneva on a regular basis and their program is mostly the same. The difference in ranking is literally nonexistent. Check the college for yourself if you can, it'll be better than rankings. Check the campus, how good the professors are, etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
817
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
639
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K