Do Mathematical Truths Depend on the Existence of Mathematical Objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter poverlord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ontology Theories
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the philosophical implications of mathematical truths and their dependence on the existence of mathematical objects. Participants argue that mathematical statements, often structured as conditional statements, do not require the existence of their content to be considered true. The conversation highlights the tension between mathematical abstraction and physical reality, suggesting that mathematical truths are encoded in the physical brain, which operates under the laws of physics and chemistry. This raises questions about the nature of truth in mathematics and its correspondence to the real world.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical logic and conditional statements
  • Familiarity with philosophical theories of truth
  • Basic knowledge of neuroscience related to cognitive processes
  • Awareness of the relationship between mathematics and physical reality
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the philosophy of mathematics, focusing on Platonism vs. nominalism
  • Research mathematical logic, particularly the structure of conditional statements
  • Investigate the neuroscience of cognition and how it relates to abstract thought
  • Examine theories of truth in philosophy, especially correspondence theory
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, mathematicians, cognitive scientists, and anyone interested in the foundational questions of mathematics and its relationship to reality.

poverlord
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I have been thinking about the problem of mathematical truths. We simply do not know if the things that mathematics deals with really exist or not, yet people still believe that its statements are true and indubitable. Unfortunately, the only truly well-respected theory of truth in the sciences requires some notion of sentences "corresponding" to the real world. If it turns out that mathematical "objects" don't exist then what can we say about mathematical truths. In short, how can we say true things about stuff that does not exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The concept of a 'mathematical truth' ,like any other concept, is generated by billions of interconnected neurons in the brain that are physical, and follow laws of physics, and chemistry. So in a sense, a 'mathematical truth' is encoded in a physical medium which allowed it to be so.
 
poverlord said:
Hey guys, I have been thinking about the problem of mathematical truths. We simply do not know if the things that mathematics deals with really exist or not, yet people still believe that its statements are true and indubitable. Unfortunately, the only truly well-respected theory of truth in the sciences requires some notion of sentences "corresponding" to the real world. If it turns out that mathematical "objects" don't exist then what can we say about mathematical truths. In short, how can we say true things about stuff that does not exist?
All mathematical statements are of the form "If ... then ..." (even if the "if" part is not explicitely stated). That is, mathematics is about "structure", not "content". Think of mathematics as "templates" where you enter the specific content into the "blanks".

It is true, from the meanings of the words "or" and "if ... then", that "if a is true, then "a or b is true", is a true statement. The "content"- what "a" and "b" mean and whether a is true or not, is not part of that statement and the truth of the statement does not depend on the truth of a and b separately.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
640
  • · Replies 136 ·
5
Replies
136
Views
24K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
28K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 148 ·
5
Replies
148
Views
19K
  • · Replies 147 ·
5
Replies
147
Views
11K