Theory of Everything or Troll?

slayerjacket
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This set of equations has been going around on the /sci/ boards of 4chan lately, but hardly anybody there knows what it means due to the level of math involved.

hi5TV.jpg


Supposedly it links the Standard Model and Quantum Mechanics. Could anybody here provide any insight on what these equations mean?

Here is somebody saying that the equations fit into the Standard Model Langrangian:

8j564.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
¯\(°_o)/¯ I Dunno LOL ¯\(o_°)/¯

Since it's /sci/ I'd guess troll but I'll keep an eye out here just incase some of the big boys from round here decide to look at it regardless.
 
genericusrnme said:
¯\(°_o)/¯ I Dunno LOL ¯\(o_°)/¯

Since it's /sci/ I'd guess troll but I'll keep an eye out here just incase some of the big boys from round here decide to look at it regardless.

Much appreciated.

Here's another related post. These were actually deleted from the thread, and obviously /sci/ thinks it's some conspiracy to keep it under wraps, but it could just as well be the original poster deleting them himself for whatever reason (to troll or keep the info, idk):

nASaW.jpg
 
See R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines "The Theory of Everything", Jan. 2000., for purposes of comparison.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
57
Views
7K
Replies
232
Views
20K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top