MHB Therefore, AB + BC = AC, thus proving that the given equation is true.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ac
AI Thread Summary
The discussion demonstrates that the points A(-4, 6), B(-1, 2), and C(2, -2) are collinear by using the distance formula to calculate the lengths of segments AB, BC, and AC. The calculations show that AB equals 5, BC equals 5, and AC equals 10. By adding AB and BC, the result equals AC, confirming the equation AB + BC = AC. This proves that the three points lie on the same line. The conclusion validates the initial assertion regarding the relationship between the points.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Given A(-4, 6), B(-1, 2), and C(2, -2), show that AB + BC = AC.

Can this be done using the distance formula?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, and if this is true, then what must be true of the 3 points?
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, and if this is true, then what must be true of the 3 points?

If this is true, the 3 points are collinear or lie on the same line.
 
I will solve this question without using MathMagic Lite.

AB = sqrt{(2 - 6)^2 + (-1 + 5)^2}

AB = sqrt{9 + 16}

AB = sqrt{25}

AB = 5

BC = sqrt{2 + 1)^2 + (- 2 - 2)^2}

BC = sqrt{9 + 16}

BC = sqrt{25}

BC = 5

AC = sqrt{(6)^2 + (-8)^2}

AC = sqrt{36 + 64}

AC = sqrt{100}

AC = 10

AB + BC = AC

5 + 5 = 10

10 = 10
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top