Thermal Energy I don't see why my method is wrong.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the final temperature of a system consisting of two bodies of water at different initial temperatures. The original poster presents their method using the principle of energy conservation and specific heat capacity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of energy conservation principles and the correct use of signs in the energy equations. There are suggestions to reconsider the method used for averaging temperatures and questions about the implications of temperature-dependent heat capacities.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's approach and exploring alternative methods. Some participants express differing opinions on the validity of the averaging method and its applicability to different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the setup of the energy equations and the assumptions made about the system's isolation. Participants also note the potential complexity introduced by temperature-dependent heat capacities.

Null_
Messages
227
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



300 g of water whose temp is 25*C are added to a thin glass containing 800 g of water at 20*C. What is the final temperature of the water?



Homework Equations


deltaE=mCdeltaT


The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I did:
deltaEsys=mCdeltaT
[300g (4.2 J/K/g) (Tf - 298K) ] - [800g (4.2J/K/g)(Tf- 293K) ] = 0
(300g)(Tf-298K) = (800g)(Tf-293K)
300g*Tf - 89400g*K = 800g*Tf - 234400g*K
145000g*K = 500 g*Tf
290K = Tf

The correct answer is 21.36*C (294.36 K)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are going to use different signs for the temperature difference then you need to add the two energy changes.
 
Null_ said:
[300g (4.2 J/K/g) (Tf - 298K) ] - [800g (4.2J/K/g)(Tf- 293K) ] = 0

that "-" should be "+"

ehild
 
Ah, thank you. I was thinking about: Ef-Ei=W=0, but that is obviously not the case since there are two initials and two finals.
 
Hi Null_! :smile:

(have a degree: ° :wink:)
Null_ said:
300 g of water whose temp is 25*C are added to a thin glass containing 800 g of water at 20*C. What is the final temperature of the water?

[300g (4.2 J/K/g) (Tf - 298K) ] - [800g (4.2J/K/g)(Tf- 293K) ] = 0
(300g)(Tf-298K) = (800g)(Tf-293K)
300g*Tf - 89400g*K = 800g*Tf - 234400g*K
145000g*K = 500 g*Tf
290K = Tf

The correct answer is 21.36*C (294.36 K)

Why did you use the 4.2 and the 293 ?

This is a straightforward averaging question … no point in multiplying by, or subtracting, constants that have to be eliminated later …

no wonder you made a mistake somewhere! :redface:

try it again, just finding the average temperature when 3/11 is at 25° and 8/11 is at 20° :wink:
 
Null_ said:
Ah, thank you. I was thinking about: Ef-Ei=W=0,
That's correct but by making one of the dT negative you did Ef - (-Ei) = 0
 
Don't listen to 'tiny-tim'. While his method works in this particular case, it should be derived from the law of conservation of the total internal energy of the system (since the system is thermally isolated and there is no work done on it).

As a reminder that 'tiny-tim''s rule is incorrect in general, how would you calculate the equilibrium temperature if you had some quantity of ice at -5 oC and you pour over some quantity of hot water at 80 o?
 
Dickfore said:
As a reminder that 'tiny-tim''s rule is incorrect in general, how would you calculate the equilibrium temperature if you had some quantity of ice at -5 oC and you pour over some quantity of hot water at 80 o?

Ah, but that's two different materials (or two different states, anyway) …

here, it's the same state of the same material, so the averaging method is correct (technically as well as practically). :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Ah, but that's two different materials (or two different states, anyway) …

here, it's the same state of the same material, so the averaging method is correct (technically as well as practically). :smile:

What if the heat capacity is temperature dependent?
 
  • #10
Dickfore said:
What if the heat capacity is temperature dependent?

I've never come across a question involving that! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
25K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K