High School Thinking about the mean value theorem without geometry

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) without relying on geometric visualization, focusing on numerical reasoning and real-world applications. Participants consider how to intuitively understand MVT, particularly through examples like temperature changes over time, suggesting that if two values are equal at different points, a maximum or minimum must occur in between. The conversation emphasizes the connection between the MVT and the concept of average versus instantaneous rates, likening it to the speed of a moving particle. It highlights that the theorem can be understood through logical reasoning about continuous functions and their derivatives. Ultimately, the discussion seeks to foster a deeper numerical intuition for the theorem beyond graphical representation.
archaic
Messages
688
Reaction score
214
Hello guys, is it possible to "see" the mean value theorem when one is only thinking of numerical values without visualizing a graph? Perhaps through a real world problem?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
archaic said:
Hello guys, is it possible to "see" the mean value theorem when one is only thinking of numerical values without visualizing a graph? Perhaps through a real world problem?
What do you want to know? A real world problem which can be solved due to the main value theorem? What should numerically mean? Numerically we always only get an approximation, as the likely mean value isn't rational.
 
fresh_42 said:
What do you want to know? A real world problem which can be solved due to the main value theorem? What should numerically mean? Numerically we always only get an approximation, as the likely mean value isn't rational.
By numerically I meant reasoning without resorting to geometry. In other words, how can one foster an intuition for this without seeing a graph?
 
Well, it is a direct consequence of Rolle, so the question reduces to: Can it be "seen" that given ##f(a)=f(b)## we have ##f'(c)=0## somewhere in between. E.g. if the temperature today at 3 p.m. is equal to the temperature yesterday at 1 p.m., do you consider it logical or seen without a graph, that there must have been a minimum or maximum in the meantime?

I'm afraid your question cannot be answered. It is too vague.

Here's another example (question 5):
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/math-challenge-december-2018.961292/but this is geometry, even if without a graph.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mathwonk and archaic
if you think of the derivative as the speed of a moving particle, the mean value theorem concludes that at some point during a trip, the instantaneous speed must equal the average speed for the whole trip. Assuming speed varies continuously, (or just that it satisfies the intermediate value theorem, which is true for derivatives), this is obvious. I.e. the average speed must be somewhere between the maximum and minimum speeds, hence, by virtue of the derivative satisfying the intermediate value theorem, must equal the instantaneous speed at some point.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephen Tashi and archaic
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K