Thorium salt reactors in emergencies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike_In_Plano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Salt
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the safety features of Thorium fluoride reactors, particularly in emergency cooling situations. Participants highlight that the thorium fuel cycle cannot experience a meltdown due to its low nuclear cross-section, requiring a neutron source like uranium or plutonium for fission. The molten salt reactor design includes a meltable plug that drains molten fuel in case of overheating, effectively preventing further reactions. Continuous reprocessing of the salt is suggested to minimize system lag during cooling incidents.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molten salt reactor technology
  • Knowledge of the thorium fuel cycle and its components
  • Familiarity with nuclear cross-sections and neutron sources
  • Basic principles of nuclear safety mechanisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the thorium-232 to uranium-233 fuel cycle
  • Explore the design and safety features of molten salt reactors
  • Learn about continuous reprocessing techniques for molten salts
  • Investigate the implications of low nuclear cross-sections in reactor design
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, safety analysts, and researchers interested in advanced reactor designs and emergency response mechanisms in nuclear technology.

Mike_In_Plano
Messages
700
Reaction score
35
Now that we've had another cooling incident / incidents, I'm curious how the Thorium fluoride reactor would have faired. I've read that continuous reprocessing of the salt would likely be part of the process. Does this imply that there would be less lag in the system should cooling become an issue?

- Mike
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
IIRC the thorium fuel cycle cannot "meltdown". Could be wrong though.
 
My understanding of the molten salt reactor is that there is a meltable plug that melts if the temperature gets too high, so that all the molten fuel material then drains out of the reactor core through that plug. This then averts any further reaction or heat buildup.

Thorium itself cannot sustain any runaway reaction, because its nuclear cross-section is too low. It has to be exposed to a more potent neutron source, such as uranium or plutonium.
 
sanman said:
Thorium itself cannot sustain any runaway reaction, because its nuclear cross-section is too low. It has to be exposed to a more potent neutron source, such as uranium or plutonium.

Well, what they're really talking about is a 232Th --> 233U fuel cycle.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
10K