Thought experiment: Observation via Recording

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving quantum mechanics and the concept of observation, specifically addressing whether consciousness is necessary for the collapse of the wavefunction. The scope includes theoretical implications of quantum measurement and interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a scenario where a light's state is recorded by a camcorder in an isolated setup, questioning how information about the light's state could be shared instantaneously if consciousness is required for wavefunction collapse.
  • Another participant asserts that consciousness is not required for wavefunction collapse, suggesting that measurement occurs through interaction with the environment, leading to decoherence.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the role of consciousness in measurement, indicating a belief that some interpretations of quantum mechanics suggest consciousness is necessary.
  • Another participant clarifies that measurement happens when a quantum system interacts with its environment, and that the resulting classical state is independent of conscious observation.
  • One participant reflects on their thought experiment, suggesting it aligns with commonly held beliefs about quantum measurement.
  • Another participant notes that the idea of consciousness collapsing the wavefunction is often found in popular science literature and fringe sources, implying it is not widely accepted in mainstream physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the necessity of consciousness for wavefunction collapse, with some asserting it is not required while others question this view. The discussion remains unresolved as differing interpretations of quantum measurement are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference concepts such as decoherence and the distinction between quantum superposition and classical uncertainty, but these ideas are not fully explored or agreed upon, leaving some assumptions and definitions implicit.

Vulpes vulpes
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm just a physics dilettante, so if I make no sense, please forgive me.

Imagine any setup that creates macroscopic effects from quantum events. The setup is isolated from observation. Schrödinger's cat would work, but I happen to like cats so we'll just say a light either goes on or doesn't.

Now, inside the box, along with setup, is a camcorder, which will videotape whether the light goes on or doesn't. The experiment is run and the camcorder records the experiment. Without observing the light, the tape is removed and copied. The copies are moved apart a significant distance. Then, at the same time, each tape is watched by a person.

If observation by a consciousness is required to collapse the wavefunction, then, if they show the same thing like we would expect, how did the information (about whether or not the light went on) travel instantaneously between the two copies when the copies are observed simultaneously at a distance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vulpes vulpes said:
If observation by a consciousness is required to collapse the wavefunction

No, it's not.
 
Yes, that's what I'm trying to say. Not requiring consciousness avoids the problem.

I was under the impression that the wavefunction collapses upon observation in some interpretations. Am I mistaken?
 
Measurement in quantum mechanics does not require the presence of a conscious being.

The "measurement" occurs when the quantum system under consideration interacts with the environment around it, undergoing a process known as decoherence, through which quantum effects are washed out leaving an effectively classical state as a result.

The point is that consciousness has nothing to do with measurement. The measurement occurred when the "quantum light bulb" interacted with the video camera (the video camera absorbed photons from the bulb). This caused decoherence and the video will show the light bulb in some classical state. Both copies of the video will show the same result.

There is a difference between a quantum superposition of states, and uncertainty about which classical state a system may be in. In this case, with the two unwatched videos, we have the latter.
 
So, what you're saying is, my thought experiment just illustrates what is already commonly believed.

Ah well. Kant said that genius is the ability to independently arrive at and understand concepts that would normally have to be taught by another person, so I'll take solace in that.
 
Vulpes vulpes said:
So, what you're saying is, my thought experiment just illustrates what is already commonly believed.

Yes, you find the stuff about "consciousness collapsing the wave function" only in some pop-sci books and in "fringe science" sources.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
10K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K