Thread Killer Champions: Franzbear & Moonbear

  • Thread starter Thread starter tribdog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the humorous concept of "thread killers" on a forum, where participants analyze who tends to end conversations with their posts. The top offenders identified include franznietzsche, Moonbear, and tribdog, with a playful tone suggesting a competition for the title of "thread killer." Participants debate the validity of counting last posts as a measure of thread-killing ability, arguing that it should be adjusted based on the total number of posts each user has made. The conversation shifts into a light-hearted narrative, likening thread-killing to a horror movie scenario, with participants playfully accusing each other of sabotaging discussions and attempting to "steal" the thread. The banter includes references to fictional scenarios involving dramatic rescues and humorous characterizations, maintaining a light and comedic atmosphere throughout.
  • #10,141
I don't think philosophy is undertandable. what's the philosophy of philosophy anyway? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #10,142
Doesn't this work?[/size]
 
  • #10,143
yomamma said:
Doesn't this work?[/size]
No, it doesn't!:frown:
I guess you've written it in small size. I quoted you and realized I was right!
 
  • #10,144
scott1 said:
Your not god your just a tool used to create another universe.You see your existence is key not to create this unvisere but another.
Well, let us examine this. You said before,
scott1 said:
We believe this is ressobile for the creation of our univere.
So, if this universe was created by another franzbear in another universe one of two things must be true. Either that was the original universe, or it was created by yet another franzbear. Now, since the ultimate purpose of this universe is to create another, then this must be the unifying law of the universe. Since this law binds this universe, it binds all others becuase ours is identical to the one that created it. Now, if the ultimate purpose of a universe is to copy itself then all universes will build to a point where franzbear creates another. Here we have ad infinum of franzbear's and universes. Do you see the never ending circle? It is the ultimate paradox, the height of infinity and purpose. I am the manefestation of this ultimate truth. I am.
 
  • #10,145
well, I see it. If it's your browser tet settings I'm going to scream...with laughter
 
  • #10,146
franzbear! said:
So, if this universe was created by another franzbear in another universe one of two things must be true. Either that was the original universe, or it was created by yet another franzbear. Now, since the ultimate purpose of this universe is to create another, then this must be the unifying law of the universe. Since this law binds this universe, it binds all others becuase ours is identical to the one that created it. Now, if the ultimate purpose of a universe is to copy itself then all universes will build to a point where franzbear creates another. Here we have ad infinum of franzbear's and universes. Do you see the never ending circle? It is the ultimate paradox, the height of infinity and purpose. I am the manefestation of this ultimate truth. I am.
Ok I will explain this to you with math
U = \rightarrow \iint ( \frac {P}{42} ) ( \frac {\infty}{\int} ) \cdot TKC \cdot \infty \rightarrow ( \iiint )
where:
U = universe
\iint is two franzbear's!
P is physics stuff
42 is the answear to life the universe and everthing
\infty is number of post on PF:smile:
\int is franzbear!
TKC is the violity and number of post on TKC.
\iiint is three franzbears!
As you can see with \rightarrow means if there is two franzbears which means it takes two franzbears! to create a universe.Then to the right of that you can see that determines the laws of physics in a universe.Then go even futher right you can see that every universe requires TKC and PF to exist. then at the end you can see that it is possible for a universe to have three franzbears but there is a problem a universe can only have one franzbear and those franzbears will become oppoiste from each other and that universe will turn into 3 separate universes that will alll be each other evil universe twin.
 
  • #10,147
Why is franzbear an integral?
 
  • #10,148
yomamma said:
Why is franzbear an integral?
I'm not an integral, scott's just explaining my nature in the form of math.
 
  • #10,149
are you a Partial Derivative?
 
  • #10,150
yomamma said:
are you a Partial Derivative?
Considering my omnipresence, I am everything. :biggrin:
 
  • #10,151
So you're a Nazi?
 
  • #10,152
and you're jewish?
 
  • #10,153
No, you are mixing apples and oranges. Nazi is either a member of a certian political party, of which I am obviously not, or the adherent to a certain belief. While it is true that I am everything it would include Nazism.

Now, before you call for my death, let me explain. As you know I am paradoxical, so I am the essence of both truth and falsehood. Therefore I am both the falsehoods of Nazis and the what little truth might, and probably can't, be found in their ideolagy.

As for being a Jew, that is dependent on who my parents are. Since I am not flesh and blood I cannot be of any particular race. If you are talking about the religion of judeism, I have already explained my existence as per beliefs.
 
  • #10,154
You're info says "posts: 3" where else have you posted except for GD? You're just another member pretending to be franzbear. Faker.
 
  • #10,155
yomamma said:
You're info says "posts: 3" where else have you posted except for GD? You're just another member pretending to be franzbear. Faker.
I posted once in Skepticism and Debunking, once in philosophy, and I honsetly don't know where the third post comes from. I did warn you that once TKC hit 10,000 that I could post anywhere, these three posts are just proof of that.

Besides, even if I am another memeber, you people should be smart enough to figure it out. You'll never find me though, because I don't exist as you could hope to imagine! I'm above and beyond mere human thought.
 
  • #10,156
Moonbear, get a list of I.P.'s
 
  • #10,157
Not only won't Moonbear do that, she's too good of a parent to allow someone like you to find me :wink:, it wouldn't do you any good. I'm not posting from any computer, I'm posting from the internet itself.
 
  • #10,158
You're either Lisa! or YDOAPS.
 
  • #10,159
yomamma said:
Moonbear, get a list of I.P.'s
I think franzbear!=Moonbear:bugeye: .Didn't you notice the bear at the end of both names.Or I'am just a crazy parnoid concipracy theoriest:confused:
 
  • #10,160
yomamma said:
You're either Lisa! or YDOAPS.
Proof yomamma, I am awaiting proof. (taps proverbial foot in impatience)
 
  • #10,161
scott1 said:
I think franzbear!=Moonbear:bugeye: .Didn't you notice the bear at the end of both names.Or I'am just a crazy parnoid concipracy theoriest:confused:
A legacy of my parent, that is all. Or is it? :rolleyes:
 
  • #10,162
I'd say Dawguard (sp?) or Mk. But neither of them have posted here for awhile. Scitt1 never puts spaces after his periods, you do. But you capitalize some words, unlike YDOPS. Thus you are Lisa!, or someone I have not thought of yet.
 
  • #10,163
yomamma said:
Scitt1 never puts spaces after his periods, you do. But you capitalize some words, unlike YDOPS. Thus you are Lisa!, or someone I have not thought of yet.
Who's scitt1:confused: . I never herd of him is he that new .
 
  • #10,164
Theories, theories, but no proofs! Your analysis could point to nearly every member here that actually grammer checks their posts.
 
  • #10,165
shut up.

(Scott1, sorry. I almost put an i instead of a u in 'shut' :redface:)
 
  • #10,166
franzbear! said:
Your analysis could point to nearly every member here that actually grammer checks their posts.
Wait just a minuite I just realized somthing!If you were therd then you couldn't make any gramer incorrections because computers have spell check.:approve:
 
  • #10,167
scott1 said:
Wait just a minuite I just realized somthing!If you were therd then you couldn't make any gramer incorrections because computers have spell check.:approve:
Uh hu, right. You seem to forget the defenition of a "therd". It is the essence of all the posters. I am not a computer, I am not a computer program. You fail to grasp my philisophocal essence.
 
  • #10,168
franzbear! said:
Uh hu, right. You seem to forget the defenition of a "therd". It is the essence of all the posters. I am not a computer, I am not a computer program. You fail to grasp my philisophocal essence.
So your saying that everone who posted here is you?
cool I made the 10,180 post this better then the 10,000 post:approve:
 
  • #10,169
no, you're just a sore loser.
 
  • #10,170
scott1 said:
So your saying that everone who posted here is you?
cool I made the 10,180 post this better then the 10,000 post:approve:
If I had lungs they would be heaving an emormous sigh right now. I am not everyone. I am not everyone. Repeat after me, I am not everyone! I am the essence of everyone! Have you ever read existential philosophy? If you haven't then I recommend starting right now. I am the abstraction of everyone here, and consequentially I am the abstraction of everything!