Three Cylinders On Top of a Rough Surface and the Force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves three identical cylinders stacked in a triangular formation on a horizontal rough surface. The goal is to determine the minimum angle between the force acting on the cylinders and the vertical. Given that the surface is horizontal and the cylinders are rough enough to prevent slipping, the solution requires applying static equilibrium equations. Specifically, the forces acting in both the x and y directions must be analyzed to derive the minimum angle, which is not simply 45° but must be calculated based on the forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium and free body diagrams
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of frictional forces and their components
  • Ability to analyze forces in two dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of static equilibrium equations for multiple bodies
  • Learn about the components of frictional forces in stacked systems
  • Explore examples of force analysis in triangular formations
  • Investigate the role of angles in force distribution among stacked objects
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as engineers and anyone involved in analyzing forces in stacked systems.

. Arctic.
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three cylinders with the same size, density, and structure are piled on each other and on top of a rough surface. Find the minimum angle which the direction of the force acting between the cylinders and the rough surface makes with the vertical? The cylinders are stacked like this. There are two on the bottom and one at the top making a triangle shape. I'm not entirely sure if they want a number since no other information is given. I want to say it's at 45° angle, but I keep thinking I have to prove it using various equations. I wouldn't mind a hint. Thanks in advance for your help.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two things aren't clear: is the surface horizontal? are the cylinders rough enough to prevent slipping between themselves?
If yes to both then I would think you can calculate the angle exactly, so it's not a matter of there being a minimum angle. OTOH, if no to both then I would think there's not enough information.
 
Yeah. The surface they are on top definitely is horizontal and from looking at the drawing provided, the cylinders are in fact rough enough to stay on top of each other without slipping. I may be over thinking it.
 
Ok, I think I now see why it's still a matter of finding a minimum. So, put in some unknowns for magnitudes and directions of forces (using the symmetry) and write down free body equations for static equilbrium.
 
Here is some additional information.

Can be solved using F=ma in the x and the y direction. Study, for example, the bottom right cylinder. In the y direction, you have the weight of the cylinder, the y-component of the friction, between the top cylinder and the bottom right cylinder, the y-component of the push caused by the top cylinder on the bottom right cylinder. The sum of the y-component of all these 3 forces is equal to 3W/2. In the x-direction you have the push coming in from the bottom left cylinder and acting on the bottom right cylinder, you have the x-component of the friction between the top cylinder and the bottom right cylinder, the friction from the ground acting on the bottom cylinder and another force. To get a minimum angle set the horizontal force acting by the left cylinder on the right cylinder equal to zero.
 
Quite so. So go ahead and write out the free body equations for one of the lower cylinders. Create symbols for unknown forces as necessary (using a different symbol for each). Look at the sum of vertical forces, the sum of horizontal forces, and moments about the centre of the cylinder.
 
Thanks for all the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K