Three point charges with a central fourth charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving four point charges, where three charges (q) form the vertices of an equilateral triangle and a fourth charge (Q = -q) is placed at the center. The equilibrium condition is established as Q = -q/√3, ensuring that the forces acting on the corner charges balance out. The work done in moving the corner charges to infinity is calculated using improper integrals, resulting in zero work due to the symmetry of the system and the nature of the forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law and its applications
  • Understanding of electric potential energy
  • Improper integrals in calculus
  • Concept of equilibrium in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of charge distributions on electric potential energy
  • Learn about the stability of equilibrium in electrostatic systems
  • Explore advanced topics in electrostatics, such as multipole expansions
  • Investigate the role of symmetry in physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, as well as educators and researchers interested in charge interactions and potential energy calculations.

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



It is the last part, part (c) that I'm having trouble with, but I'll post the entire question for clarity.

Three charges (q) form the vertices of an equilateral triangle. A fourth charge Q (Q = -q) is placed at the center of the triangle.

(a) will the charges at the corners move away from or towards the center?

(b) for what value of Q will all four points remain stationary?

(c) in situation (b) how much work is done in removing the charges to infinity? (I interpret this to mean keep the center charge where it is and moving the corner charges out to infinity)

Homework Equations



Relevant to (c)

Distance between vertices: d

Distance between a vertex and the center: s = \frac{d}{\sqrt{3}}

Constant of Coulomb's Law: A

After solving (a) and (b)

In equilibrium: Q = \frac{-q}{\sqrt{3}}

Force is a function of s

F = F(s)

Two body interactions

||R|| = force of repulsion on a vertex resulting from vertex charge repulsion

||R|| calculated initially in terms of d but then converted to be in terms of s

||P|| = force of attraction on a vertex resulting from vertex-center charge attraction

||P|| calculated to be in terms of s

F(s) = magnitude of the resulting force on a vertex charge in terms of distance between vertex and center

F(s) = ||R|| - ||P|| = Aq(\frac{q}{\sqrt{3}} - 3Q)\frac{1}{s^2}

from (b) Q = \frac{-q}{\sqrt{3}}

but we're using ||P|| so remove the sign from the front of that eqn.

so F(s) = ||R|| - ||P|| = Aq(\frac{q}{\sqrt{3}} - \sqrt{3}q)\frac{1}{s^2}

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I'm having a conceptual understanding deficiency on (c).

I know how to do improper integrals. I know that W = Fs and in this case F = f(s), so

Work = \int_{\frac{d}{\sqrt{3}}}^\infty F(s) ds

Work = \int_{\frac{d}{\sqrt{3}}}^\infty Aq(\frac{q}{\sqrt{3}} - \sqrt{3}q)\frac{1}{s^2} ds

Using improper integration yields for me

Work = A\frac{-2q^2}{d}

edit: clarify - work done in moving one of the vertices to infinity

4. The texts answer

The text did not use any improper integrals as I did.

The text says:

As potential energy of the system

U = \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \Sigma_{i \neq j} \frac{q_iq_j}{r_{ij}} = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \left[3\frac{q\times q}{d}+\frac{3q(\frac{-q}{\sqrt{3}})}{\frac{d}{\sqrt{3}}}\right]=0

And as for finite charge distribution potential energy at infinity is always zero

W=U_F-U_I = 0-0 =0

I don't understand this last explanation. Surely as you move the vertex charge away from the center, the attraction to the center dominates over the repulsion from the other vertices and the amount of work needed to drag it out...wait...the other vertices are moving to infinity at the same rate too...so the repulsion and the attraction stay in the same proportion...

Is this saying...that if you moved all three charges (provided they were in equilibrium at the beginning) away from the center, all at the same rate of motion and ensuring that they keep in an equilateral triangle configuration, and you moved them all equally to an arbitrary distance away from their original config...that zero work has been done?? This seems highly counter-intuitive to me...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kostoglotov said:
In equilibrium: Q = \frac{-q}{\sqrt{3}}
---------------------------------------------
...wait...the other vertices are moving to infinity at the same rate too...so the repulsion and the attraction stay in the same proportion...

Is this saying...that if you moved all three charges (provided they were in equilibrium at the beginning) away from the center, all at the same rate of motion and ensuring that they keep in an equilateral triangle configuration, and you moved them all equally to an arbitrary distance away from their original config...that zero work has been done?? This seems highly counter-intuitive to me...

Yes. Good observation! Note that the condition for equilibrium is Q = \frac{-q}{\sqrt{3}}, and this is independent of the size of the triangle. You could give each of the three corner charges a little "outward" initial velocity and they would glide with constant speed all the way to infinity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
Your ##
F(s) = ||R|| - ||P|| = Aq(\frac{q}{\sqrt{3}} - 3Q)\frac{1}{s^2}
## should be ##
F(s) = ||R|| - ||P|| = Aq(\frac{q}{\sqrt{3}} - Q)\frac{1}{s^2}
## and with that your integrand is zero!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
989
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K