I'm currently looking at Metric for the Rain Frame in 'Exploring Black Holes' by Taylor & Wheeler (page B-13) and while it's straightforward understanding dr(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); _{rain}(which basically equals dr), I'm having a problem getting my head around dt_{rain}. The following is a step-by-step approach but for some reason, the results I get from the metric are negative. (Attached is an extract from the book which shows the metric in full, hopefully this is acceptable).

from the book-

[tex]dt_{rain}=-v_{rel}\gamma dr_{shell}+\gamma dt_{shell}[/tex]

where-

[tex]dr_{shell}=dr\left(1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}\right)^{-1/2}[/tex]

[tex]dt_{shell}=dt\left(1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}\right)^{1/2}[/tex]

[tex]v_{rel}=-\left(\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}\right)^{1/2}[/tex]

[tex]\gamma \equiv \left(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}\right)^{-1/2}=\left(1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}\right)^{-1/2}[/tex]

Incorporating the above equations into the dt_{rain}equation, I get-

[tex]dt_{rain}=\left(\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}\right)^{1/2} dr\left(1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}\right)^{-1} + dt[/tex]

which tallies with equation 14 on page B-13.

Based on a 3 sol mass black hole (R_{s}=8861.1 m), r=11,000, dr=1 and dt=1, I get the following-

[tex]dt_{rain}=(0.897527 \times 5.142830)+1[/tex]

[tex]dt_{rain}=5.615829[/tex]

The metric for the rain frame (on a radial line only) is-

[tex]d\tau^2=\left(1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}\right)dt_{rain}^2 - 2\left(\frac{2Gm}{rc^2}\right)^{1/2}dt_{rain}dr -dr^2[/tex]

The results I get here where dr=1 and dt_{rain}=5.615829 are-

[tex]d\tau^2=(0.194445 \times 5.615829^2)-(1.795054 \times 5.615829)-1[/tex]

[tex]d\tau^2=-4.948399[/tex]

Obviously something is amiss here as dτ^{2}shouldn't be negative outside the event horizon.

I have a hunch I'm about 95% there but there's a mistake I'm making somewhere. I'd appreciate any feedback regarding getting this right.

Steve

_____________

UPDATE

I've applied the same black hole parameters and radius to standard Schwarzschild metric and I get (more or less) the same answer, dτ^{2}=-4.948385. This is corrected by introducing c^{2}to dτ^{2}and dt^{2}providing an answer for dτ of 0.440959 (in standard Schwarzschild metric) which makes more sense. This tells me I need to incorporate c^{2}to the rain metric but when applied to both quantities of dt_{rain}, the results are still negative.

______________

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Time coordinate in the rain frame

Loading...

Similar Threads - coordinate rain frame | Date |
---|---|

I Converting galactical coordinates to horizontal/geographical coordinates | Nov 27, 2016 |

I Orientation of the Earth, Sun and Solar System in the Milky Way | Oct 10, 2016 |

I Cartesian and polar quantities | Sep 25, 2016 |

Saturn: Helium Rain, or non-indigenous planet? | Oct 16, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**