Time derivative of relativistic momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The time derivative of relativistic momentum is defined as p(t) = m·γ(t)·v(t), where γ = c/√(c²-v²) and c is the speed of light. The derivative is expressed as {d/dt}p(t) = γ³(t)·a(t), with a(t) = dv(t)/dt. This formula is valid and indicates that relativistic momentum is conserved, despite its absence in many standard texts. The discussion highlights the importance of considering rapidity in the context of accelerating particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of relativistic mass
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Basic principles of kinematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of rapidity in relativistic motion
  • Learn about the conservation laws in relativistic physics
  • Explore advanced texts discussing the time derivative of momentum
  • Investigate the relationship between velocity and acceleration in relativistic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of advanced mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of relativistic momentum and its applications in theoretical physics.

birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Did I understand correctly that relativistic momentum is

p(t) = m\cdot\gamma(t)\cdot v(t),​

where \gamma = c/\sqrt{c^2-v^2} and c is the speed of light? For the fun of it I wrote down the time derivative and got

{d\over dt}p(t) = \gamma^3(t)\cdot a(t)​

with a(t) = d v(t)/dt. Yet I cannot find the funny exponent of 3 of a \gamma anywhere in a book. Am I missing a trivial transformation of \gamma^3 a into a better known form? Or is it that the time derivative of relativistic momentum is not an important concept, which is why I did not come across this formula before?

Additional question: is p as define above is a conserved quantity?


Harald.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the mass is constant. It's the relativistic mass (=\gamma m) that isn't constant.

Birulami, your calculation is fine, and yes, the p you have defined is conserved. I don't know why you can't find it in a book. One possible reason is that it's often convenient to talk about rapidity instead of velocity when you're describing the motion of an accelerating particle. E.g. in post #15 in this thread, the ^3 appears on a hyperbolic function (eq. 12).

You may also find the calculation I did in #15 in this thread interesting.
 
Last edited:
You're right, I plead temporary brain lapse. The mass is constant. \gamma ensures that m is the rest mass.
 
\frac{d\bf p}{dt}= m\frac{d}{dt}\left[\frac{\bf v}<br /> {\sqrt{1-{\bf v}^2}}\right]<br /> = m[\gamma{\bf a}+\gamma^3{\bf v(v\cdot a)}]<br /> =m\gamma^3[{\bf a}+{\bf v\times(v\times a)}].
with c=1. Either final form is useful.
dp/dt is important, and is discussed in advanced texts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fredrik said:
You may also find the calculation I did in #15 in this thread interesting.

Indeed. I'll take a closer look. Thanks,
Harald.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K