LightningInAJar said:
Can time dilation vary without a gravity well or accelerating a viewer towards light speed?
The two things you refer to are not the same anyway; the common usage of the same term, "time dilation", to refer to both is a source of confusion, not understanding.
The easiest way to see that the two things are not the same is to observe that time dilation due to relative speed is symmetric--each observer calculates the other's clock to be "running slow" (though this calculation is actually a coordinate artifact--see below)--while gravitational time dilation is not symmetric--both observers will agree that the clock of the one who is at a higher altitude in the gravitational field is running faster (but again the usual way of doing that calculation is a coordinate artifact--see below).
LightningInAJar said:
Are there other variables that affect the flow of time?
What you are calling "the flow of time" is an artifact of coordinates, not a physical thing. As far as you are concerned, your own time always flows at the same rate--1 second per second. And if you are not co-located with someone else, there is no invariant way for you to specify how their "flow of time" relates to yours.
What
is a physical thing is what is properly called "differential aging", such as in the "twin paradox", where two twins separate and then come back together and find that their ages are no longer the same. Unfortunately, there is no single general rule that predicts which one will have aged more, other than the brute force rule of computing the lengths of the two paths through spacetime that the twins follow and comparing them. Nor is there, as noted above, any invariant way of specifying the "rate of time flow" of the two twins while they are separated; the only invariant fact of the matter is their relative ages when they meet up again. Nor is there any short, simple list of things that can cause differential aging; there are an infinite number of possible curved spacetime geometries, and an infinite number of possible paths through spacetime between two points in any given spacetime geometry.
In many cases, claimed comparisons between "rates of time flow" involve particular choices of coordinates, but those choices are left implicit and not acknowledged, which can also cause confusion. For example, in the case of gravitational time dilation between two observers who are at rest at different altitudes in a gravitational field, the comparison of their "rates of time flow" implicitly uses coordinates in which they, and the gravitating mass whose field they are in, are all at rest. Other choices of coordinates could lead to different answers. To really make the comparison properly, one would need to add further invariants to the scenario--for example, the two observers could exchange round-trip light signals and measure the round-trip travel times by each of their clocks; the observer at higher altitude would find the round trip light signals to take more time by his clock, and this is an invariant that does not depend on any coordinate choice. However, this kind of thing only works for observers at rest relative to each other (so that the round trip light travel times don't change); it wouldn't work for observers in relative motion in flat spacetime.