Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of perturbation theory to a complex, non-Hermitian matrix while using the standard methods outlined in Chapter 6 of "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths. The user confirms that the unperturbed matrix is real and symmetric, allowing for straightforward calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. They express confidence that the standard perturbation techniques for Hermitian Hamiltonians can be applied to their non-Hermitian perturbed matrix without issues, as the derivation in Griffiths does not explicitly require the perturbed matrix to be Hermitian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrices
  • Knowledge of Hermitian and non-Hermitian matrices
  • Basic concepts from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of using perturbation theory with non-Hermitian matrices
  • Review Chapter 6 of "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths for detailed derivations
  • Explore examples of perturbation theory applications in complex systems
  • Investigate alternative methods for analyzing non-Hermitian matrices in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in applying perturbation theory to complex systems.

Gwyn-Gwyn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am working on a physics project for which I need to use perturbation theory to calculate the first- and second-order corrections to the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a perturbed matrix. The unperturbed matrix is real and symmetric, and the eigenvalues and eigenvectors are easy to calculate. However, the perturbed matrix is complex and non-Hermitian (the perturbation introduces complex components on the main diagonal). I am new to perturbation theory. My question is whether I can use the standard matrix perturbation theory for Hermitian Hamiltonians, as explained in Chapter 6 of "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths. Clearly, the unperturbed matrix needs to be Hermitian, but it doesn't seem as if the perturbed one has to be. I would just like to double-check this.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I went through the derivation in Griffiths, and didn't see the assumption that the perturbed matrix has to be Hermitian being used anywhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never used perturbation theory with non-Hermitian matrices, but I don't foresee any problem in using the standard approach.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K