Time-independent Schrödinger Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Time-independent Schrödinger Equation in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the relationship between the wave function at time t=0, denoted as \Psi(x,0), and the time-independent wave function \Psi(x). Participants explore the implications of these expressions in the context of quantum systems like the square well.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether \Psi(x,0) is equal to \Psi(x), seeking clarification on the terminology and implications of these expressions.
  • Another participant explains that, in general, \Psi(x,0) and \Psi(x) are not the same, particularly in systems with bound-state solutions, such as the square well, where energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are defined.
  • A technical explanation is provided regarding the general solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, which involves a sum over energy eigenfunctions weighted by coefficients.
  • Several participants discuss issues with LaTeX formatting in their posts, indicating a technical problem with displaying mathematical expressions correctly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the equality of \Psi(x,0) and \Psi(x), with at least one participant asserting they are generally not the same, while others seek clarification on the definitions and context.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing issue with LaTeX processing on the forum, which may affect the clarity of mathematical expressions in the discussion.

soul
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I have been studying Quantum mechanics course for one month and our subject for now is Time-independent Schrödinger Equation. What I couldn't figure out is whether [tex]\Psi(x,\,0) = \Psi(x)[/tex], since [tex]\Psi(x,\,0)[/tex] doesn't contain any time dependence and [tex]\Psi(x)[/tex] as well. Can someone explain me that that expression is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your LaTeX isn't showing up for me... but it looks like you are asking whether psi(x,0) is equal to psi(x).

In which case, what do you mean by psi(x,0) and psi(x)?
 
I am new in quantum and there could be some lack of terminology in my question. I mean that Schr. Eq. at t = 0 which is shown as psi(x,0) and wave function independent of time psi(x) are the same in sqaure well and in some other cases??
 
In general, no. Consider a potential like the square well that has only bound-state solutions. Then there is a discrete set of allowed energies, the energy eigenvalues, [itex]E_n[/itex], and corresponding eigenfunctions, [itex]\psi_n(x)[/itex], [itex]n=1,2,\ldots[/itex] ; these are the solutions of the time-independent Schrödinger equation. Then, the most general solution of the time dependent Schrödinger equation is
[tex]\psi(x,t)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n e^{-iE_nt/\hbar}\psi_n(x),[/tex]
where the [itex]c_n[/itex]'s are arbitrary coefficients.

EDIT: something seems wrong with the TeX processing on the new server ...
 
to fix your LaTEX issues, you need to close with [/itex] or [/tex]...
 
Dr Transport said:
to fix your LaTEX issues, you need to close with [/itex] or [/tex]...
I did close with [/tex] and [/itex], but the slashes disappeared after uploading. This is a problem with the new server; see https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1922963
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K