Undergrad Time Reversal Operator: Physics Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Time
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the time reversal operator in both classical and quantum physics. It highlights the misconception that a ball would increase its velocity upwards when time is reversed, despite the downward force acting on it. Instead, the correct interpretation involves understanding the mathematical representation of motion under time reversal, specifically how the equation of motion changes when time is negated. The participants clarify that time reversal does not imply a ball moving against gravity but rather reflects the mathematical symmetry in physical laws. This illustrates the complexities of time reversal in physics and its implications for understanding motion.
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am a bit confused about the physical meaning of time reversal operator (both in classical and quantum/QFT physics). Classically if we drop a ball, I can easily see why this is invariant under the translation operator, but I am not sure I understand how does it work with the time reversal. We would see a ball increasing its velocity upwards, despite having a force acting on it downwards? How does this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silviu said:
We would see a ball increasing its velocity upwards, despite having a force acting on it downwards
No, we would not see that. The path of a ball is given by ##y(t)=-\frac{g}{2}t^2+v_0 t +y_0##

What do you get if you map ##t \to -T##
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K