The discussion revolves around the concept of time travel as depicted in the movie "Back to the Future." Participants explore the implications of time travel within the film's narrative, debating the nature of timelines and the validity of the title in relation to the events that occur. The conversation touches on both fictional and scientific aspects of time travel, as well as the philosophical implications of the plot.
Participants generally do not reach a consensus, as multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of time travel in the film and its implications for timelines. The discussion reflects a mix of opinions on the validity of the arguments presented.
Participants note that the discussion involves speculative reasoning about a fictional narrative, which may not adhere to established scientific principles. The conversation also highlights the challenge of applying real-world physics to fictional scenarios.
Before...OCR said:how... Data became the possessor of two heads.....
That happens... lolMike Godwin said:
Data's "brother" did exist.OCR said:Well, since we went off track on Back to the Future... I want to post about another time travel story, only this one was on TV.
Of course, it's another Star Trek, The Next Generation creation, a two-part episode called... "Time’s Arrow".
I saw the first episode, with my wife, while visiting my in-laws down in Arizona... and literally chased the second episode all the way back to Montana... lolWhat Wittenberg wrote is OK, I guess, but I have never figured out how...
Data became the possessor of two heads.....