mathwonk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2024 Award
- 11,952
- 2,222
I have my own issues with Wikipedia. I often find useful information there about things I am ignorant of, but do not post on things I feel knowledgable about, after one experience, when I tried to post an answer to a question about the Riemann-Roch theorem.
My elementary and concrete version was quickly altered and eventually erased, in favor of a generic abstract modern account, written by someone possibly less conversant with, or less appreciative of, classical sources.
So to me the problem with Wikipedia is that everyone has license to edit work of others, leading to a sort of generic second or third hand homogenization of readily available treatments. Thus I often prefer individual signed explanations such as one can find here, and on mathoverflow, and tend to restrict my contributions to such sites.
My elementary and concrete version was quickly altered and eventually erased, in favor of a generic abstract modern account, written by someone possibly less conversant with, or less appreciative of, classical sources.
So to me the problem with Wikipedia is that everyone has license to edit work of others, leading to a sort of generic second or third hand homogenization of readily available treatments. Thus I often prefer individual signed explanations such as one can find here, and on mathoverflow, and tend to restrict my contributions to such sites.
Last edited: