Top Interview Tips for Nailing Your Next Job - Expert Advice and Strategies"

  • Thread starter Thread starter _N3WTON_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interview Job
Click For Summary
Effective interview strategies emphasize the importance of preparation and interaction. Candidates should familiarize themselves with the company and prepare thoughtful questions to foster a dialogue during the interview. Practicing responses to common questions and addressing potential anxiety through techniques like journaling can enhance performance. It's crucial to convey genuine understanding rather than memorized answers, as interviewers value authenticity. Ultimately, building a connection with the interviewer can significantly improve the chances of success in securing the job.
  • #31
Mark Harder said:
Always remember that it's a buyer's market now. They will probably have a long short-list, so their decision to invite you for a 2nd interview may depend on a gut feeling or might be as simple as where your name appears on that list. You may very well be highly qualified, but arbitrary factors ruled you out. Some of these arbitrary factors won't even make sense if you found out what they are. I once applied for a technical writer position in a large electronics firm. They had me take an aptitude test that included things like describing in words only how to peel and core an apple. I thought I did OK, but didn't get the job. The interviewer, who worked for an HR contractor, took the the trouble to explain that her client would not hire any engineers, scientists or English majors! She seemed to be as bemused as I. One wonders what background would have satisfied them. But then, have you read any user manuals lately...
Another factor out of your control may be that they already know who they want, but affirmative-action rules require that they advertise and interview some minimum number of applicants. I don't know if this unfair practice is as common as back in my day. If it is, one clue to be found in the job announcement is its list of qualifications that wouldn't be met by anyone applicant. That's just the point. They can always justify their decision to hire their favorite with the explanation that no other candidate met their (impossible) requirements.
Point being, it's possible to over-think the problem. If you think the interview went well, yet neither you nor experienced friends can understand why, the answer may be that HR's decision-making process is arcane, even nonsensical, and there was nothing you could have done about it. You can't change yourself in that case, and you shouldn't try. Just move on. It was bad luck , nothing more.
Thanks for your response. As I expected, I did not get asked back for a second interview. Although I did desire the internship, I'm trying not to get too upset because I still have a few applications out for internships that I'd prefer. One thing that I am a little perplexed about is that the interviewer made it very clear that all interviewees would be told whether or not they were being asked back for a second interview, but I have still not heard anything, even after politely emailing the interviewer. To me it seems unprofessional, but maybe it is common practice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Still send a thank you and ask to be considered for any future internships. Maybe even ask them what courses would be helpful the next time around. Basically keep a dialog going as sometimes people drop out and you could be considered next.
 
  • #33
_N3WTON_ said:
One thing that I am a little perplexed about is that the interviewer made it very clear that all interviewees would be told whether or not they were being asked back for a second interview, but I have still not heard anything, even after politely emailing the interviewer. To me it seems unprofessional, but maybe it is common practice?

If you were chosen you would have been notified by now, but if you have not not heard anything either way and they said they would do so, then you may not have been finally rejected yet. They may be holding on to your materials, as someone else here suggested, because they don't have a definite commitment from another candidate to whom they offered the position. Or they may not have had the time to call you back yet. Or they don't typically care enough to respond, even to send a form-letter email to you and all the other rejectees. That's the norm these days. Time is money and they won't take the time to send negative letters, which may number in the thousands. Yes, the new norm is rude. That said, I think you wouldn't be out of line to wire them again in a few days, thank them again and ask for an update.

My action item is to keep on sending out new applications, every day if possible. Don't waste any time sitting by the phone waiting for your prince to come. Also, you need to know that sending applications, other things being equal, is not the most likely method to succeed. Number one method is building personal contacts through networking. Go to conferences and job fairs. Let everyone who'll listen that you're searching. If you think you may have struck up a rapport with someone and they show any interest in your search, background, where you want to go, etc., then let them know and ask them if they have any recommendations. They may know someone who's been looking around for a candidate. If so, ask your new acquaintance if you can mention their name when you contact the person they suggest. You should also show an interest in them, particularly if they are in the same boat as you; and offer any help you can. When you phone or write your new prospect, they will be reluctant to insult you knowing that you have the ear of their friend or colleague. This is exactly what you want - you will have a strong leg up when they remember (fondly, one hopes) your intermediary. It's just human nature. Face-to-face contact will always be a more influential search mode than meeting you via a bunch of bytes. Another advantage of building personal relationships is that they work in real time, so to speak. They will cut to the chase. If you make a favorable impression on such a prospect, you most likely will be asked to submit your materials directly to him or his secretary. When you chat it up with anyone helpful, remember to take their business card or information so you can write them and tell them how much you enjoyed your chat and appreciate their help. Who knows? They might run across the very same prospect they recommended at a faculty meeting, or whatever, the next day with your creds fresh on their mind. For most folks making face-to-face contact like this is a little daunting. My reluctance to put myself out there in person was probably my greatest weakness when I was looking for work. You got to practice and learn new social skills if that's what you need. Never ventured nothing gained, blah, blah...
 
  • #34
Mark Harder said:
If you were chosen you would have been notified by now, but if you have not not heard anything either way and they said they would do so, then you may not have been finally rejected yet. They may be holding on to your materials, as someone else here suggested, because they don't have a definite commitment from another candidate to whom they offered the position. Or they may not have had the time to call you back yet. Or they don't typically care enough to respond, even to send a form-letter email to you and all the other rejectees. That's the norm these days. Time is money and they won't take the time to send negative letters, which may number in the thousands. Yes, the new norm is rude. That said, I think you wouldn't be out of line to wire them again in a few days, thank them again and ask for an update.

My action item is to keep on sending out new applications, every day if possible. Don't waste any time sitting by the phone waiting for your prince to come. Also, you need to know that sending applications, other things being equal, is not the most likely method to succeed. Number one method is building personal contacts through networking. Go to conferences and job fairs. Let everyone who'll listen that you're searching. If you think you may have struck up a rapport with someone and they show any interest in your search, background, where you want to go, etc., then let them know and ask them if they have any recommendations. They may know someone who's been looking around for a candidate. If so, ask your new acquaintance if you can mention their name when you contact the person they suggest. You should also show an interest in them, particularly if they are in the same boat as you; and offer any help you can. When you phone or write your new prospect, they will be reluctant to insult you knowing that you have the ear of their friend or colleague. This is exactly what you want - you will have a strong leg up when they remember (fondly, one hopes) your intermediary. It's just human nature. Face-to-face contact will always be a more influential search mode than meeting you via a bunch of bytes. Another advantage of building personal relationships is that they work in real time, so to speak. They will cut to the chase. If you make a favorable impression on such a prospect, you most likely will be asked to submit your materials directly to him or his secretary. When you chat it up with anyone helpful, remember to take their business card or information so you can write them and tell them how much you enjoyed your chat and appreciate their help. Who knows? They might run across the very same prospect they recommended at a faculty meeting, or whatever, the next day with your creds fresh on their mind. For most folks making face-to-face contact like this is a little daunting. My reluctance to put myself out there in person was probably my greatest weakness when I was looking for work. You got to practice and learn new social skills if that's what you need. Never ventured nothing gained, blah, blah...
Thanks again. I definitely need to work on my networking skills. In fact, a few of my friends from class have found internships mostly because of who they know (neighbor works for the company, father is the CFO, etc.) Some of that may be luck more than networking, but I suppose you need a mix of both in order to succeed :)
 
  • #35
I won't write a book chapter this time ;-) . But yes, if you don't have the sort of contacts your friends have, you need to network. If you do have contacts like them, you might try practicing on the contacts (with their permission of course).
 
  • #36
Mark Harder said:
I won't write a book chapter this time ;-) . But yes, if you don't have the sort of contacts your friends have, you need to network. If you do have contacts like them, you might try practicing on the contacts (with their permission of course).
Thank you. I'm starting to think that one of the main reasons I have been having trouble even getting asked to job interviews is that I went with Mechanical Engineering. To me it seems, in my area at least, that Electrical/Computer Engineers and Computer Scientists are all that are in demand :(. I was wondering if maybe someone who is actually in the industry could give some thoughts on that?
 
  • #37
I would advise you to be proactive: learn as much as you can about your potential employer. Answering the questions you may quote the info you have learned and this will surely be a plus. Read lots of books in your professional sphere and quote them as well. This could make the conversation more relaxed.
Besides, read the articles about the job interviews - they are countless! There you will find a lot about the commonly asked questions, tricky questions, proper answers and numerous 'DOs' and 'DONTs'. This will make you feel more confident and prepared.
 
  • #38
To these answers (the ones I've read, anyway) I would add the following: Definitely ask questions about the place, the position you're interviewing for, the structure of that department, esp. to whom you will reporting (your immediate supervisor). If you know the project(s) on which you will contribute, etc. I'd save some pay and benefits questions 'till a second interview, unless you haven't a clue about them. I don't think it looks good if you leave an interview without knowing that all important fact. If you have any special requirements that may apply to you, my best guess is that you save them 'till the 2nd interview. Second interviews are pretty much the norm these days. If they fly you to your first interview, that indicates they have enough interest in your hire to go to that expense. However, I wouldn't assume that you are the only candidate being considered.

I'm sure they expect that you are nervous, but don't fidget, spin your pen in your fingers, etc. That might mean that your mind is wandering. I realized halfway through an interview that I was doing that. I stopped, but I'm pretty sure it was noticed. I didn't get the job. I've never been asked one of those trick questions that probe your values and psychology, so I'm really not sure how to respond to one. I've heard that one kind is the "what would you do if you caught your mother, best friend, boss, etc. cheating the company?" I'll hazard a guess and say that you might respond that loyalty is a strong value of yours, that reporting the person would be a very difficult decision to make because it pits one set of loyalties against another. Otherwise, it's probably expected that you will choose the company's interest first.

In your personal life, if one person rejects you it might not be your fault; they might have a problem. In the case of a company, they may simply have gone with another candidate who seems to better meet their needs. But, as in life, if many interviews go down in flames, perhaps it is about you. Reading the books may not be enough. Seek out professional opinions or classes and such.

And high up on the list: Be articulate.
 
  • #39
You are not in school any more. The answer they're looking for is commitment and capability. This is not some word problem. This is an interview to see how well you will play with others in the organization. Believe it or not, technical knowledge is secondary. You are expected to learn on the job. You are expected to adapt. You are expected to convey what is going on with others.

Project those values, and you'll do fine.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
  • #40
JakeBrodskyPE said:
You are not in school any more. The answer they're looking for is commitment and capability. This is not some word problem. This is an interview to see how well you will play with others in the organization. Believe it or not, technical knowledge is secondary. You are expected to learn on the job. You are expected to adapt. You are expected to convey what is going on with others.

Project those values, and you'll do fine.

So true, great answer.

I remember it said that a job is 15% skill and 85% percent working well with others no matter how difficult they are to work with.

I don't how the OP did as he/she posted in March 2015.
 
  • Like
Likes MathewsMD

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
127
Views
22K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K